IBJNews

Area home sales slide again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Home-sale agreements in the nine-county Indianapolis area plummeted more than 27 percent in July compared to the same month of 2009, according to a report released Wednesday by residential real estate firm F.C. Tucker Co.

The decline marked the third straight month that home sales have slumped in central Indiana following three straight months of improving sales activity spurred by generous federal tax credits.

Pending home sales dropped from 2,351 in July 2009 to 1,707 last month, a decline of 27.4 percent. Pending sales were down 30 percent in June and 32 percent in May.

Pending home sales account for sales agreements, not sales that have closed. Year-to-date, sales agreements are off 2 percent from the same seven months of 2009.

In Marion County, July sales agreements fell 32.5 percent compared to the previous year, from 1,100 to 743. Pending sales dropped 25.6 percent in Hamilton County, from 496 to 369, and 32.3 percent in Hendricks County, from 198 to 134.

Johnson County saw the area’s smallest decline, as pending sales dropped 11.9 percent, from 177 to 156.

On a positive note, the average price of homes sold in the area in July was up 9.8 percent, from $146,155 in July 2009 to $160,496 in July 2010. Home prices were up 18.2 percent in Hamilton County, to $277,966, and 6.7 percent in Marion County, to $119,786.

Home inventory was up 5.8 percent in July from a year ago, with 17,276 homes listed in the nine-county area.
 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Back in my teens/early 20s, Chicago's in Greenfield was a spot where my friends and I ate on a constant basis. Chicago's has always offered good pizza and bread sticks, but after getting married and buying a home, their prices and locations have made it so I would only get their pizza once every three years. They have expanded into McCordsville, but sadly closed the downtown Indy store years ago (this was the coolest layout for a restaurant in my opinion).

    Just recently we decided to try Chicago's at the old Greenfield location. While it was clean, they haven't updated much over the last five years or so. Still the same layout, booths, tables, etc.. I made a comment to my wife about how that place hasn't changed in years. Good to see they are doing well enough to build a newer building.

  2. INDIANA CASINOS ARE TIGHT. OTHER OUTSIDE CASINOS HAVE WINNERS ALL DAY LONG. PEOPLE HIT REGULARLY AT OUTSIDE CASINOS, INDIANA CASINOS HAVE FEW WINNERS ESPECIALLY THE LARGER JACKPOT WINNERS. PEOPLE ARE NOT WINNING ENOUGH AT INDIANA CASINO , SO THEY ARE NOT FUN TO VISIT. I,D RATHER TRAVEL TO OUTSIDE CASINO AND TAKE THE CHANCE ON WINNING AND HAVING FUN DOING THAT , THEN TO KNOW THAT YOUR CHANCES AT WINNING AT A INDIANA CASINO AREFAR AND IN BETWEEN.

  3. record low crowd and a record low TV audience.

  4. for an IRL carb day. Like a record tv number,,,,that would be soooo hard

  5. For those of you who think the state didn't do as much as they should...the state did $6M more than they should!!! As a taxpayer I am opposed to the $6M!!!

ADVERTISEMENT