IBJNews

State gambling revenue expected to stay flat

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s share of tax money generated by the state’s 13 casinos is expected to remain relatively flat for at least the next few years, a state fiscal analyst told Gaming Study Committee members this morning.

The committee, consisting of eight state legislators and the executive director of the Indiana Gaming Commission, is meeting today to consider state gaming issues, including changes at Indiana’s two horse tracks with casinos.

Jim Landers, fiscal analyst for the committee, told members that tax money will decline or remain flat in fiscal 2010, and might increase only slightly the following fiscal year.

The average growth rate of gambling tax revenue historically had been about 5.5 percent, before it began declining by single digits the past few years, he said.

“This is sort of striking compared to what we’ve become used to, in terms of riverboat and wagering taxes,” Landers said.

The state received $818.9 million in tax money from the state’s casinos in fiscal 2008.

Today’s discussion was set to include proposed tax breaks for the so-called "racinos" and whether to allow table games. The racinos — which feature slot machines and electronic games, but not the table games found at traditional casino — say they are struggling to bring in enough revenue to make interest payments on debt they took out to pay state licensing fees.

Owners of Hoosier Park in Anderson and Indiana Live in Shelbyville were saddled with a hefty $250 million one-time state license fees for the slot machines. They also spent millions of dollars more to upgrade their facilities last year after slots were approved.

Hoosier Park could be in danger of going bankrupt, Indiana Gaming Commission Director Ernie Yelton said recently.

Indiana measures casino performance by adjusted gross receipts, or total gambling revenue minus payouts to players. In 2008, Indiana's 13 casinos eked out a modest 1.65-percent increase in AGR. But that's only because Hoosier Park and Indiana Live opened their expanded casinos midyear. The state's 11 existing casinos saw AGR drop 6.15 percent.

In other words, the racinos drew business away from the riverboats — a trend that seems to be continuing this year.

In July, AGR at Indiana Live climbed 27 percent, to $19.1 million, compared with the same month in 2008, when it had only a temporary gambling facility. At Hoosier Park, AGR improved by 4.6 percent. 

But some rivals are wilting under the economy and additional competition. AGR was down by double digits at several casinos, including Ameristar in East Chicago (21 percent), Majestic Star in Gary (18 percent) and French Lick Hotel & Casino (11 percent).

“We’ve had some flattening out and declines in revenue.” Landers said. “A lot of it has to do with racinos. They’ve displaced some business at the casinos. That’s obvious, to some extent.”

Overall, the state’s 13 casinos recorded AGR in July of $251.4 million, a 4-percent increase from the year-ago period.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT