Part of Mississippi’s Zyprexa case against Lilly dismissed

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. has won a bid to dismiss part of a negligence lawsuit brought by Mississippi that
alleges improper marketing of antipsychotic drug Zyprexa for unapproved uses, according to Bloomberg News.

Mississippi,
like many other states that have sued Lilly, is seeking reimbursement for money spent in the state’s Medicaid program on Zyprexa
prescriptions. However, U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein on Tuesday granted part of Lilly’s request for a decision before
trial on Mississippi’s claims and dismissed most of the allegations, except one that Lilly charged Mississippi more than the
drug was worth.

"The use of aggregate proof to establish essential elements of Mississippi’s theories of
recovery is barred by applicable law,” Weinstein wrote in a 117-page order that denied the state’s request for a summary
judgment ruling in its favor.

The judge, based in Brooklyn, N.Y., put further proceedings on hold pending the outcome
of an appeal of similar rulings he issued in other Zyprexa cases that he’s presiding over.

Weinstein wrote
that a ruling in favor of Mississippi could have put Lilly out of business.

"If allowed to proceed in their
entirety, the state’s claims could result in serious harm or bankruptcy for this defendant and the pharmaceutical industry
generally," he wrote. "For the legal system to be used for this slash-and-burn style of litigation would arguably
constitute an abuse of the legal process. Constitutional, statutory and common law rights of those injured to seek relief
from the courts must be recognized. But courts cannot be used as an engine of an industry’s destruction."

Zyprexa,
Lilly’s best-selling drug, has been the subject of federal and state investigations into marketing practices.

The company settled with the U.S. Justice Department in January for $1.42 billion, including about $362 million to more
than 30 states. Several other states that did not participate in the federal case have reached separate settlements or agreements.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In