Purdue to help businesses, towns participate in global economy

Associated Press
February 26, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Purdue University is offering help to Indiana communities and businesses to tap into the global economy, beginning with China.

Purdue's Global Business Engagement Initiative will is a joint effort with the school's office of engagement, university officials said. China is the first country chosen for the initiative, which is aimed at generating trade and investment opportunities for Indiana companies and communities.

Purdue announced the move Friday at its Indiana Mayoral Roundtable on China, which included 100 leaders from 39 cities, including more than 20 mayors.

"Purdue is willing to help Indiana communities of all sizes develop a China strategy, assess Chinese demand for Indiana products and investments, market their business opportunities in China, and provide expertise on cultural and business dimensions of Chinese investors," Michael A. Brzezinski, Purdue's interim dean of international programs, said in a news release.

He said Purdue's ties with Chinese universities also connect it to Chinese research parks, potential investors and sources of business partners for Indiana firms.

Other Purdue resources include engineering faculty who provide technical consulting services and programs to promote Chinese language and culture through business workshops and translation services.

"Purdue University is home to an array of resources that Indiana officials can tap as they pursue economic opportunities with China, the second largest economy in the world," Brzezinski said.

Guoqiang Yang, consul general for China in Chicago, was the keynote speaker at the Indiana Mayoral Roundtable and spoke about trends in Chinese investment in the Midwest. Indiana mayors who traveled to China with Gov. Mitch Daniels in 2009 and 2010 also spoke about their experiences.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing