IBJNews

Auto auctioneer KAR sees quarterly profit surge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The parent company of the Adesa auto auction company boosted revenue and profit in its fourth quarter, easily beating the forecast of Wall Street analysts.

Carmel-based KAR Auction Services Inc. announced Wednesday after U.S. markets closed that it pulled in profit of $7.3 million in the three months ended Dec. 31, a 38-percent jump from the $5.3 million it earned in the same quarter the prior year.

On a per-share basis, KAR earned 5 cents in each quarter, but its number of diluted shares grew by nearly 25 million in 2010.

Excluding debt payments, accounting charges and stock-based compensation resulting from KAR’s 2007 acquisition of Adesa, the company would have earned $27.5 million, compared with $16.3 million earned on that adjusted basis in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Adjusted earnings per share were 20 cents in the most recent quarter. On that basis, analysts expected KAR to earn 14 cents per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

KAR’s fourth-quarter revenue of $441.3 million also beat analysts’ forecasts, who were expecting $424.5 million. KAR’s revenue was 5.6 percent higher than in the fourth quarter of 2009.

For all of 2010, KAR earned $69.6 million, or 51 cents per share, compared with 2009 earnings of $23.2 million, or 21 cents per share.

For all of 2011, KAR predicted it would earn $1.20 to $1.25 per share, excluding the special charges from the 2007 merger. In 2010, adjusted earnings were $1.05 per share.

Adesa conducts used-vehicle auctions for car dealers at 70 locations in North America. KAR also owns Insurance Auto Auctions Inc., a salvage auto auction company with 159 North American locations, and Automotive Finance Corp., which provides car loans through used vehicles dealers at 88 North American locations.

Shares of KAR fell Wednesday by nearly 4 percent, closing at $14.45 apiece, before quarterly results were announced. The company’s stock price is still up nearly 5 percent so far this year.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT