IBJNews

Baldwin & Lyons sees quarterly profit on fewer disasters

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Baldwin & Lyons Inc. on Thursday reported a profitable second quarter, a year after a series of  major natural catastrophes caused a big loss for the transportation industry insurer.

Earnings rose to $4.1 million, or 27 cents a share, compared with a loss of $5.5 million, or 38 cents a share, in the second quarter of 2011.

It was the third straight profitable quarter for Baldwin & Lyons after three straight losing quarters during a catastrophe-filled 2011. Events weighing on the bottom line in 2011 included tornadoes in Alabama and Missouri.

Second-quarter revenue fell nearly 10 percent from a year ago, to $58.3 million, due to a 5-percent decrease in written premiums and $3.5 million in investment losses.

The company said the decline in premium volume was in part related to planned changes in its private passenger automobile and commercial multi-peril products.

Baldwin & Lyons is best known for insuring truck and public transportation fleets, but the insurer has been diversifying its product offerings. Early in the quarter, the firm's Protective Specialty Insurance Co. began offering liability coverage to medical professionals. Protective already offers liability insurance to professionals such as insurance agents and real estate agents.

Baldwin & Lyons shares were down 20 cents early Thursday, to $21.95 per share.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT