IBJNews

Baldwin & Lyons sees quarterly profit on fewer disasters

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Baldwin & Lyons Inc. on Thursday reported a profitable second quarter, a year after a series of  major natural catastrophes caused a big loss for the transportation industry insurer.

Earnings rose to $4.1 million, or 27 cents a share, compared with a loss of $5.5 million, or 38 cents a share, in the second quarter of 2011.

It was the third straight profitable quarter for Baldwin & Lyons after three straight losing quarters during a catastrophe-filled 2011. Events weighing on the bottom line in 2011 included tornadoes in Alabama and Missouri.

Second-quarter revenue fell nearly 10 percent from a year ago, to $58.3 million, due to a 5-percent decrease in written premiums and $3.5 million in investment losses.

The company said the decline in premium volume was in part related to planned changes in its private passenger automobile and commercial multi-peril products.

Baldwin & Lyons is best known for insuring truck and public transportation fleets, but the insurer has been diversifying its product offerings. Early in the quarter, the firm's Protective Specialty Insurance Co. began offering liability coverage to medical professionals. Protective already offers liability insurance to professionals such as insurance agents and real estate agents.

Baldwin & Lyons shares were down 20 cents early Thursday, to $21.95 per share.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT