IBJNews

Baldwin & Lyons reports higher revenue, lower profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Baldwin & Lyons Inc., an Indianapolis-based insurer of car and truck fleets, saw lower profit in the fourth quarter compared with a year ago, despite an uptick in revenue.

The company announced Thursday morning that it earned $10.3 million, or 69 cents per share, in the latest quarter, compared with $10.9 million, or 74 cents per share, in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Quarterly revenue rose to $67.7 million, up from $60.8 million in 2009.

The insurer’s underlying business, which excludes investment gains and losses, produced $6.4 million, or 43 cents per share, compared with a record $8.2 million, or 56 cents per share, in the fourth quarter of 2009.

The company reported an underwriting gain of $5.6 million in the fourth quarter, identical to its gain in the same period in 2009. For the entire year, however, the underwriting gain was $2.1 million compared with a gain of $17.1 million in 2009. The results reflect more than $24 million in catastrophic losses from “several global events” in 2010, the company said.

Quarterly premiums written by Baldwin & Lyons’ insurance subsidiaries increased 7 percent compared with the fourth quarter in 2009 and were up 18 percent for the entire year. The increase includes higher volume on traditional products, including fleets, as well as new products such as commercial multi-peril and casualty reinsurance.

Net premiums in the quarter also rose by 13 percent, to $57.5 million. For the entire year, net premiums jumped 18 percent, to $214.7 million.

Profit in 2010 slid to $25 million, or $1.69 a share, from $44.8 million, or $3.04 a share, in 2009.

Total revenue in 2010 increased to $249.5 million, up from $232.6 million in 2009.

Shares of Baldwin & Lyons opened trading Thursday morning at $23.54 each, up from a 52-week low of $20 in June.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT