IBJNews

Baldwin & Lyons reports higher revenue, lower profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Baldwin & Lyons Inc., an Indianapolis-based insurer of car and truck fleets, saw lower profit in the fourth quarter compared with a year ago, despite an uptick in revenue.

The company announced Thursday morning that it earned $10.3 million, or 69 cents per share, in the latest quarter, compared with $10.9 million, or 74 cents per share, in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Quarterly revenue rose to $67.7 million, up from $60.8 million in 2009.

The insurer’s underlying business, which excludes investment gains and losses, produced $6.4 million, or 43 cents per share, compared with a record $8.2 million, or 56 cents per share, in the fourth quarter of 2009.

The company reported an underwriting gain of $5.6 million in the fourth quarter, identical to its gain in the same period in 2009. For the entire year, however, the underwriting gain was $2.1 million compared with a gain of $17.1 million in 2009. The results reflect more than $24 million in catastrophic losses from “several global events” in 2010, the company said.

Quarterly premiums written by Baldwin & Lyons’ insurance subsidiaries increased 7 percent compared with the fourth quarter in 2009 and were up 18 percent for the entire year. The increase includes higher volume on traditional products, including fleets, as well as new products such as commercial multi-peril and casualty reinsurance.

Net premiums in the quarter also rose by 13 percent, to $57.5 million. For the entire year, net premiums jumped 18 percent, to $214.7 million.

Profit in 2010 slid to $25 million, or $1.69 a share, from $44.8 million, or $3.04 a share, in 2009.

Total revenue in 2010 increased to $249.5 million, up from $232.6 million in 2009.

Shares of Baldwin & Lyons opened trading Thursday morning at $23.54 each, up from a 52-week low of $20 in June.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT