LOU'S VIEWS: Barging in

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

For years, I’ve advocated for an increased Indianapolis presence for productions coming out of Indiana, Purdue and Ball State universities.

Imagine how much stronger our cultural lives would be if we had those schools’ dance, theater, music and other offerings showcased here. Even those of us who occasionally hit the highway to visit those places would benefit from, say, a vibrant performing arts center at IUPUI.

Ah, a boy can dream.

But it’s not all fantasy. We’ll get a taste of what could be when Indianapolis Opera, for the first time, presents an Indiana University Opera production at Clowes Hall: Philip Glass’ “Akhnaten,” March 8-9.

ae-main-dsc4709-15col.jpg “Akhnaten” prepares to take over the kingdom after the death of Amenhotep III in Philip Glass’s opera. (Photo courtesy of IU Opera Theater)

Facing challenging financial times over the past few seasons, Indianapolis Opera has chosen not to simply retreat and try to rebuild but, rather, to explore different cost-effective ways of bringing opera to Indy. Previous cases included offering smaller-scale operas at the Basile Opera Center. This time, it’s Mayflowering a full IU production here, sans a few stagehands.

The “Akhnaten” to be staged here is pretty much the same as the production Feb. 22 to March 2 in Bloomington. And I couldn’t resist heading down there for a look. Now, after having seen the piece, I’m anxious to see how Indy audiences more accustomed to “Carmen” and “Turendot” react.

True to his reputation, Glass isn’t a composer whose work is easy to warm up to. As demonstrated here, his relentless repetition can strike some as hypnotic and others as infuriating. The music inches forward like a series of waves on the beach, steadily moving the shoreline while offering little to surf on. It makes Ravel’s “Bolero” seem like a roller-coaster ride.

“Akhnaten” is named for the pharaoh who threw out the pantheon of Egyptian deities, replacing them with a single sun god—thus, briefly, promoting monotheism. We see his ceremonial rise to power after the funeral of Amenhotep III. We get a love song with wife Nefertiti based on an ancient poem. We see the building of his would-be utopian city, Akhetaten (imagine a massive summer camp Jenga game). And we flash forward 17 years to his neglect of his country’s needs, leading to his overthrow.

Want more of university talent?Glass’ opera isn’t terribly interested in constructing an inner life for the leader. He doesn’t even let the countertenor sing until he’s been onstage for what seems like 20 minutes. Often, his performers have nothing to do while the music flows. Sometimes, they sing in sounds rather than words. And in the middle of the second act, we suddenly aren’t in ancient Egypt at all but, rather, surrounded by a chorus singing (stunningly) an Old Testament psalm in Hebrew.

The nearly three-hour production is framed with a lengthy display of oversized slides of more recent unrest in Egypt. The specificity and duration of the images hurt its potential timelessness. They also seem to push for audience identification with the mob that overthrows Akhnaten, which doesn’t seem to jibe with the intent of the composer.

Whatever the intent, the production doesn’t have a clear point of view. Did Akhanten pave the way for future monotheistic faiths? Or is he just an anomaly—a footnote in religious history? Clues are scarce.

The real hero of the piece, though, is the outstanding—and sizable—violin-free orchestra, speaking Glass’ difficult language fluently. You might find yourself distractedly pondering, with awe, the concentration required to address Glass’ musical challenges. And maybe that’s the key. Embracing “Akhnaten” as a piece of music rather than a full-blown opera leads to different rewards … for the patient, well-rested and open-minded.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


  • Intrigued
    After reading your review, I got tickets to see this on Saturday. Sounds splendid!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.