Barron's says Simon stock among best for 2014

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Higher interest rates and a tougher retail environment have punished the stock of real estate investment trusts the likes of Simon Property Group Inc.

Shares of the Indianapolis-based shopping-mall giant trade lately around $152 each, down from a high of more than $180 in the spring.

But the owner of more than 320 retail properties still landed on the Barron’s list of top stock picks for 2014, with the financial publication citing an improved outlook and an analyst upgrade.

“Despite the growth in online retailing, Americans still like shopping at malls; foot traffic was higher over the Thanksgiving weekend than it was a year earlier,” Barron’s wrote in Saturday's edition.

A key measure for REITs known as funds from operations was up about 11 percent for Simon in the third quarter and is expected to grow 8 percent in 2014.

Simon’s occupancy rate was up about 1 percent, to 95.5 percent, in the third quarter, which is near all-time highs. Profit was up 22 percent through the first nine months of this year.

Barron’s also pointed to Morgan Stanley’s recently boosted price target for Simon: to $186 a share from $180.

It also didn’t hurt that Simon recently boosted its dividend by 5 cents, to $1.20 per share.

In the third quarter, Simon opened three new premium outlet centers, including St. Louis Premium Outlets in Chesterfield, Mo., near Interstate 64.

It’s also been disposing of less-lucrative holdings. It recently sold Arsenal Mall and Office, near Boston, and Terrace at The Florida Mall, in Orlando, fetching $76 million. 

Among other stocks Barron’s likes in 2014 are Citigroup, Deere & Co., General Motors, Intel Corp., MetLife, Nestle SA and US Airways Group.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now