IBJNews

Barron's says Simon stock among best for 2014

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Higher interest rates and a tougher retail environment have punished the stock of real estate investment trusts the likes of Simon Property Group Inc.

Shares of the Indianapolis-based shopping-mall giant trade lately around $152 each, down from a high of more than $180 in the spring.

But the owner of more than 320 retail properties still landed on the Barron’s list of top stock picks for 2014, with the financial publication citing an improved outlook and an analyst upgrade.

“Despite the growth in online retailing, Americans still like shopping at malls; foot traffic was higher over the Thanksgiving weekend than it was a year earlier,” Barron’s wrote in Saturday's edition.

A key measure for REITs known as funds from operations was up about 11 percent for Simon in the third quarter and is expected to grow 8 percent in 2014.

Simon’s occupancy rate was up about 1 percent, to 95.5 percent, in the third quarter, which is near all-time highs. Profit was up 22 percent through the first nine months of this year.

Barron’s also pointed to Morgan Stanley’s recently boosted price target for Simon: to $186 a share from $180.

It also didn’t hurt that Simon recently boosted its dividend by 5 cents, to $1.20 per share.

In the third quarter, Simon opened three new premium outlet centers, including St. Louis Premium Outlets in Chesterfield, Mo., near Interstate 64.

It’s also been disposing of less-lucrative holdings. It recently sold Arsenal Mall and Office, near Boston, and Terrace at The Florida Mall, in Orlando, fetching $76 million. 

Among other stocks Barron’s likes in 2014 are Citigroup, Deere & Co., General Motors, Intel Corp., MetLife, Nestle SA and US Airways Group.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT