IBJNews

Basketball legend Robertson target of bank’s lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Basketball legend Oscar Robertson’s financial woes have extended to his hometown of Indianapolis, where he is attempting to convince a Marion Superior Court judge that he isn’t responsible for a $203,000 bank loan.

Robertson’s money troubles in Ohio, where he played collegiately at the University of Cincinnati from 1957 to 1960 and professionally for the Cincinnati Royals in the 1960s, have received media attention in recent weeks.

He faces foreclosure on his chemical company Orchem Corp.’s headquarters in Fairfield, Ohio, for nearly $200,000 in back property taxes and interest. Robertson and his wife also personally owe more than $2.4 million to two banks for loans on the Fairfield building.

In the meantime, M&I Bank for more than three years has been attempting to collect on the $203,000 it loaned Robertson and another of his companies, Tyffany Real Estate and Management Inc. of Jasper in southern Indiana.

A hearing is set for Oct. 1 on M&I’s request to have Judge Heather Welch award it a judgment without a trial.

M&I’s four-page complaint filed in January 2009 says Robertson defaulted on the loan he received about a year earlier. The loan was to finance preliminary work on a senior housing facility planned at the old high school in Jasper.

But Robertson contends he isn’t responsible for the loan because the bank fraudulently induced him into signing a guaranty in spite of his assertions that he didn’t have the finances to back the note.

Robertson, 73, claims a bank employee told him he shouldn’t worry because the money loaned under the note would be “rolled into” the permanent financing of the project, which would be secured by the building itself.

“Mr. Robertson has designated evidence that the bank, by deed and conduct, induced him to sign the guaranty it now seeks to enforce, the same guaranty bank officials told Mr. Robertson to not worry about,” lawyers for Robertson argued in an August court document.

A longtime friend and business partner of Robertson’s, Indianapolis entrepreneur Joseph Wolfla, is not named in the suit, but gave a deposition supporting Robertson. Wolfla last year helped reintroduce the Choc-Ola chocolate beverage to store shelves after a 10-year hiatus.

Robertson starred at Crispus Attucks High School in Indianapolis, leading the team to a 31-1 record in 1955 and the first state championship for any all-black school in the nation. The following year the team finished a perfect 31–0 and won a second straight state title.

He led a group of college players to an Olympic gold medal in 1960 and went on to a Hall of Fame career in the National Basketball Association with the Royals and the Milwaukee Bucks. Many basketball experts consider him to be the greatest all-around player in history.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Big O
    Big O, I wish you and yours the very best. Having been there before; I can only say, have a GREAT Lawyer.I spoke to you; on the phone, many years ago, when I lived in Denver and you were on a Q & A, from a local Sports Radio Program.I told you then; You are of the Best Athlete's I ever had the great fortune to watch and its still TRUE, today.Best of luck to You and Your Family. God Bless You and Yours. Bill Snyder.
  • Note to Mark
    Millions of people sign bank loan documents everyday, and 99.9% of those people have no clue regarding the committal agreements they are signing. I tell anyone who will listen to hire a lawyer to read all bank loan documents before they sign on the dotted line. I could not imagine counting on a real estate sales person, a loan officer, a title clerk, or anyone else when signing a multimillion dollar property loan agreement. I am guessing that Mr. Robertson is going to lose this one, not because he was duped, but because he should have hired an attorney before it ever started.
  • Yeah right!
    So we're supposed to believe that the bank is verbally induced him??? Come on, Big O- we know you didn't fall for that! What evidence do you have of this fraudulent inducing? Did you tape the conversation? Everyone knows verbal agreements don't hold up, especially in court and when you're dealing with a bank. Robertson should have known to read the guaranty loan or have his attorney read it. I bet it says absolutely nothing in writing about any money being "rolled into" permanent financing. HA! What happened to the senior facility? Did he spend the money anyway? Sounds suspicious to me. Guess we'll have to wait and see what happens at the hearing on 10/1.
  • Oscar
    Mark, likely a good thing you are not the judge, as he/she has responsibility for reviewing/evaluating all the facts before a decision is rendered. Easy to condemn based on limited information.
  • Not responsible????
    "But Robertson contends he isn’t responsible for the loan because the bank fraudulently induced him into signing a guaranty in spite of his assertions that he didn’t have the finances to back the note." You signed it, you're responsible.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

    ADVERTISEMENT