IBJNews

Bayh says he will not run for governor in 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh said Sunday he won't seek a return trip to the governor's office in 2012.

"After careful consideration, I have concluded that the appropriate decision is not to be a candidate for governor of Indiana in 2012," Bayh said in a prepared statement.

The 54-year-old Indiana Democrat didn't run for a third term in the Senate in November. His seat was won by Republican Dan Coats.

Bayh, of Indianapolis, served two terms as governor, from 1989 to 1997. Many Indiana Democrats had hoped a Bayh candidacy for governor in 2012 could begin reversing a string of setbacks for their party.

The governor's office comes open in 2012 as term-limited Republican Mitch Daniels will be leaving.

"I've been flattered by the speculation about me running for governor in 2012," Bayh said. "I was honored to serve as our governor for eight years. It was a job I cherished every day. Working with a wonderful team, we established a record of creating jobs, cutting taxes, balancing the budget, improving education, reforming welfare and much more of which I am very proud."

Bayh said the main reason for the decision is the well-being of his twin sons.

"As I've said since the day my children were born — when I was governor — my most important job is being a good father. My boys are now in high school, and in my judgment, a run for governor at this time in their lives would be potentially very disruptive."

A centrist whose father, former Sen. Birch Bayh, lost to Dan Quayle in 1980, the younger Bayh first took office in 1987 as secretary of state. That led to a successful 1988 bid for governor that ended 20 years of Republican control of Indiana's top office.

"Another factor in my thinking is whether I want to be in politics my entire life," Bayh said Sunday. "I've been privileged to be in elective office for 22 years and was first elected when only 30 years old. Serving the people of Indiana has been the honor of my life.

"But as I said when I announced my retirement from the Senate, there are many honorable ways to contribute to society — creating jobs, growing a business, helping guide an institution of higher learning, or helping run a worthy charitable endeavor. I'll continue to serve, but my contributions will take a different form and on a different stage."

Indiana Democratic Chairman Dan Parker told The Indianapolis Star that Bayh's departure leaves a void at a tough time for the party.

"Our Moses, who led us to the promised land, has announced he's not going to lead us back to the promised land," Gregg said. "He made Indiana a two-party state. He showed Republicans and independents and Democrats that Democrats could win. He showed the state that Democrats could govern, and govern responsibly and successfully. That was something that hadn't happened in a generation."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • your not all right
    He could go to another state and run for office and win. Not too sure that yo voted for him in the past elections the way you sound.
  • So
    Evan is a carpet bagger like Coats and Hillary. maybe he can go run for something in another state because he would not get my vote for how he has turned his back on this state and the president when he was needed the most. he is a big pussycat scared to get into the fight and get dirty and we don't need wimps right now. good bye, bayh and turn off the light will ya.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

    2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

    3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

    4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

    5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

    ADVERTISEMENT