IBJNews

Bid deadline looms for former Hilbert mansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Salutations, Hilbert mansion aspirants.  Please excuse the indelicacy, but note that Friday is the last day to submit your bid or get off the bidet.

As of mid-morning, “several” bids had been submitted in the auction for the 25,000-square-foot-mansion once owned by Conseco Inc. co-founder Stephen Hilbert, said Prudential Indiana agent Greg Cooper. He declined to elaborate, saying only some bids were markedly better than others.

Cooper is co-listing agent with Dick Richwine, who heads the local real estate firm.  Technically speaking, they’ll accept bids until 11:59 p.m.—just in case would-be buyers have been on the fence and experience a change of heart after a round of Friday evening cocktails.

But have $100,000 handy. That’s the so-called "earnest money" that must be submitted with each bid.

And be prepared to deliver no less than 10 percent of the total bid within one business day, assuming, of course, that you’re the high bidder and your offer is accepted.

The Carmel-based company, since renamed CNO Financial Group Inc., has been trying to sell the mansion—which it gained control of it during a court battle over loans Hilbert took out to buy Conseco stock—for five years. It went on the market with a $20 million asking price, and more recently was listed at the bargain price of $9.9 million.

The mansion at 1143 W. 116th St. is being sold “as is,” although CNO has been paying to maintain the property. The company last month announced its plans to conduct a sealed-bid auction.

Cooper previously said the mansion has drawn interest from potential buyers such as race car teams, which often wine and dine their sponsors.

The estate includes a 15,000-square-foot “sports palace,” catering facilities, a guest house and its own power plant.

The suspense over who—if anyone—lands the region’s hottest residential property will linger after the deadline expires.

“It’s unlikely anything will be finalized until next week,” Cooper said.

But there's a caviar, er, caveat: The bid terms, at www.indianamansion.com, note that the seller “reserves the right to accept a bid prior to or after the bid submission deadline.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT