IBJNews

Big portfolio of local apartments changes hands

Cory Schouten
August 12, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local construction company specializing in apartment renovations is paying $80 million to acquire a huge local portfolio from the nation's largest owner of apartment communities.

Ardizzone Enterprises Inc. has agreed to buy 1,885 units from Denver-based Apartment Investment & Management Co., or AIMCO. The sale includes Bent Tree near 86th Street and Michigan Road, Brookwood at U.S. 31 and Thompson Road, Cheswick Village at 30th Street and Post Road, Reflections at 79th Street and Harcourt Road, and Winchester Village at Madison Avenue and Stop 11 Road.

The blockbuster deal was brokered by locally based Tikijian Associates. The firm received 10 offers in just 30 days for the properties, which they marketed without an asking price.

Apartment properties are attractive to buyers because occupancy rates are rising as the market for single family homes suffers.

Ardizzone, founded in 1959, most recently focused on construction, renovation and repair of apartment buildings. The firm has done work for AIMCO, including $3.7 million in work at Bent Tree and $1.5 million at Reflections.

"This is something our company has planned for the last several years," said Tony Ardizzone, one of the company's owners, in an interview with IBJ. "While we've never owned apartment communities, we're one of the largest construction contractors dealing with apartment communities in the state. We just thought it would be a good fit."

Dallas-based Lincoln Property Companies, a customer of Ardizzone's, will manage the portfolio. All current employees are being offered the opportunity to stay.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT