IBJNews

Bioanalytical Systems' CEO announces retirement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Struggling West Lafayette-based life science contract research firm Bioanalytical Systems Inc. is searching for a new top executive. Richard M. Shepperd, 69, announced his retirement on Wednesday.

Shepperd, who joined the firm in October 2006, immediately relinquished his job as company president. He also announced his intention to retire from his post as CEO and his seat on the Bioanalytical Systems board on Feb. 12.

Bioanalytical Systems replaced Shepperd on an interim basis with Anthony Chilton, 53, the firm’s chief operating officer. The company intends to conduct a national search for a permanent CEO.

Located in Purdue University’s Research Park, Bioanalytical Systems was founded in 1974 by Pete and Candace Kissinger. Over the years, it grew into one of Indiana’s largest locally-based life science firms. The couple led the company until August 2007, when they quietly stepped down from their management posts. He had been CEO; she was vice president of research. The Kissingers remain Bioanalytical Systems’ largest shareholders, with a 26-percent stake.

Bioanalytical Systems originally hired Shepperd to cut costs. He ended up presiding over one of the roughest patches in the firm’s history. Its annual revenue declined from $45.2 million in 2007 to $31.8 million in 2009. And the modest $926,000 Bioanalytical Systems booked as profit in 2007 was followed by two years of losses: $1.5 million in 2008 and $5.5 million last year.

As a result, Bioanalytical Systems’ stock price has tumbled. Before the recession began, the company’s shares traded on NASDAQ for more than $8. Early Thursday, they were worth 80 cents each.

The company Shepperd departs is much smaller than the one he inherited. At its peak, Bioanalytical Systems had 375 employees. According to the firm's 2009 annual report, headcount had shrunk to 257.

Shareholders have been attempting to turn Bioanalytical Systems around. On April 6, 2009, the Kissingers sent a joint letter to the company’s board and the Securities and Exchange Commission, outlining concerns about its direction and management. Their concerns were shared by Wisconsin stockbroker Thomas Harenburg, who sent a letter of his own. With a 5.6-percent stake, Harenburg is Bioanalytical Systems’ next-largest shareholder.

Last summer, both Kissingers wrote fresh letters petitioning Bioanalytical Systems to replace several of the company’s board directors. In October, the company added Harenburg nominee David L. Omachinski. In November, Bioanalytical Systems added one of the Kissingers’ candidates, John Landis.

On Wednesday, the company also announced board chairman William Baitinger had retired. His replacement, Charlene Sullivan, is an associate professor at Purdue’s Krannert Graduate School of Management. Pete Kissinger is co-chairman of Purdue’s Department of Chemistry.

“The board would like to express its sincere appreciation to Mr. Shepperd for his strong leadership at a critical time in the company’s history,” Bioanalytical Systems board member David W. Crabb said in a statement. “We are confident that Dr. Chilton has the background, knowledge and industry experience to effectively lead the company into the future.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT