IBJNews

Bioanalytical Systems names new chief executive

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

West Lafayette-based Bioanalytical Systems Inc. has promoted Anthony S. Chilton to CEO following the retirement of top executive Richard M. Shepperd earlier this year.

Chilton, the contract research firm’s chief operating officer, has been interim president since his predecessor stepped down in January. The 53-year-old also got that job on a permanent basis.

The company announced Chilton’s appointment Thursday, citing his 30-plus years of experience as a scientist and executive at life sciences enterprises in England, Canada and the United States.

Located in Purdue University’s Research Park, Bioanalytical Systems was founded in 1974 by Pete and Candace Kissinger. Over the years, it grew into one of Indiana’s largest life science firms. The couple led the company until August 2007, when they stepped down from their management posts. He had been CEO; she was vice president of research. The Kissingers remain Bioanalytical Systems’ largest shareholders, with a 26-percent stake.

Bioanalytical Systems hired Shepperd to cut costs, and he ended up presiding over one of the roughest patches in the firm’s history. Annual revenue declined from $45.2 million in 2007 to $31.8 million in 2009. And the modest $926,000 Bioanalytical Systems booked as profit in 2007 was followed by two years of losses: $1.5 million in 2008 and $5.5 million in 2009.

It reported a $1.4 million first-quarter loss this year.

As a result, Bioanalytical Systems’ stock price has tumbled. Before the recession began, the company’s shares traded on NASDAQ for more than $8 each. The stock closed at $1.10 on Thursday.

At its peak, Bioanalytical Systems had 375 employees. According to the firm's 2009 annual report, headcount had shrunk to 257.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • About time
    Why did it take the board of Directors so long to see that Dick Shepard, Ed Chait and Mike Cox were poster boys for arrogance, greed and total incompetence. The betrayal of investors and employees places them on par with John Thain and Bernie Madoff. Having a borad include an independent member who can raise hard questions sure was needed and maybe has saved BASi

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT