IBJNews

BioCrossroads launches second seed fund

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

BioCrossroads Inc. has raised an $8.25 million seed fund in its second attempt to help fledgling life sciences companies grow to the point where they can attract venture capital or a corporate funder.

The Indianapolis-based life sciences development group announced the fund Monday—seven years after it raised its first, $6 million seed fund. That fund plowed its money into 11 different companies, helping a few receive venture capital and at least one get regulatory approval for a product.

But the need for early-stage funding has only grown the past seven years, as more investment has shifted to information technology companies, and those still in the life sciences space want to wait later and later before putting their capital at risk.

“It’s important because there just isn’t much of this kind of money out there,” David Johnson, BioCrossroads’ CEO, said in an interview. He added, “If we don’t have an investment fund, we’re missing some of the most important tools to build that opportunity.”

The Indiana Seed Fund II LLC was kicked off in late 2010 when Eli Lilly and Co. agreed to invest. The Indianapolis-based drug giant has funded BioCrossroads since the group’s founding in 2002.

Also chipping in are Indianapolis-based health insurer WellPoint Inc., Indiana University’s Research Technology Corp., Purdue University, the University of Notre Dame, the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation and BioCrossroads’ own for-profit arm.

All those organizations are on the board of BioCrossroads. Johnson declined to reveal the amounts of any of their investments.

Because the companies the Indiana Seed Fund invests in are waiting longer to attract venture capital, BioCrossroads is increasing the amount of money it can invest in a single company: up to $1 million in Indiana Seed Fund II, compared with a cap of $500,000 for Indiana Seed Fund I.

“In this market, it’s proven that we need to stick around a little longer,” Johnson said. He noted that the idea behind the first seed fund was to be a company’s first institutional investor, but that within a year or two, a bigger investor would come in.

Many of the companies financed by the first seed fund have yet to receive any venture capital, instead remaining viable by attracting a corporate funder or buyer.

The companies in which the Indiana Seed Fund I invested include SonarMed Inc., ImmuneWorks Inc., FlowCo., Fast Diagnostics, Zorion Medical Inc., AgeneBio, Bioscience Vaccines Inc.

Some, like SonarMed, have won FDA approval for products. Others, like CS-Keys Inc., have fizzled.

The first Indiana Seed Fund was funded by only two investors—the state of Indiana and BioCrossroads itself. But by having a track record, Johnson said, it became easier to raise a second fund.

“It is always a little easier to raise money for something called Seed Fund 2 instead of Seed Fund 1,” Johnson said, adding, “I think there is at least more confidence that we could pull it off this time around.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT