IBJNews

Biomet owners look to arrange $11B marriage

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Warsaw-based orthopedics behemoth Biomet Inc. could get a whole lot bigger if rumors prove true that its owners have made a bid for United Kingdom-based rival Smith & Nephew plc.

Rumors hit the U.K. press last week that the consortium of private-equity funds that owns Biomet were making an $11.2 billion bid for Smith & Nephew. That’s the number Bloomberg News reported, crediting Britain’s Daily Mail, which cited “industry gossip.”

The combined companies would have $6.5 billion in annual revenue, up from Biomet’s current sales of $2.7 billion. Biomet now is the state's second-largest private company, according to IBJ data.

Smith & Nephew already thought joining forces with Biomet was a good idea back in 2006. But it was outbid by the Blackstone Group, Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts, both based in New York, and other private equity firms that were using the easy credit of the time to invest a minimum of cash and generate spectacular returns.

“Orthopaedics is a maturing industry where scale is critical and such a deal would, with the minimum of antitrust fuss, create a fourth big global company in the market for hip and knee replacements with substantial synergies,” wrote Financial Times reporter Lina Saigol.

The othopedics industry is led by Warsaw-based Zimmer Holdings Inc., which in 2003 outbid Smith & Nephew to acquire Switzerland-based Centerpulse Inc. Zimmer—Indiana's sixth-largest public company—is trailed closely by DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., the Warsaw- based unit of Johnson & Johnson, as well as Stryker Corp., which is based in Kalamazoo, Mich.

The problem, Saigol noted, is that Biomet’s owners still have a fair bit of their debt left to pay off—$6 billion of it, in fact.

“Raising enough cash to do a deal in this environment would be challenging, if not impossible,” Saigol wrote, suggesting instead a reverse merger financed by Smith & Nephew’s publicly traded shares. “The only issue left to be resolved would be who should lead the combined group.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT