IBJNews

Biomet sales rise, but slower than expected

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana-based medical device maker Biomet Inc. said Wednesday its sales rose 2 percent in the first quarter, slower than the privately held company had expected.

Biomet's quarterly results are considered an indicator on the state of the orthopedic device industry because it reports results before most of its competitors. The largest publicly traded orthopedic device makers report their results starting next week.

Biomet said its revenue rose to $640.7 million over the three months ended Aug. 31, from $630.1 million a year ago. Excluding the effects of foreign currency exchanges, its revenue improved 3 percent.

The company said its U.S. sales rose 5 percent, to $419.1 million, while European sales fell 11 percent. Its international sales rose 11 percent. Most of Biomet's international sales are made in Canada, South America, Mexico and the Pacific Rim.

President and CEO Jeffrey Binder said its results were hurt by a decline in surgical procedures. Total revenue from sales of reconstructive products rose 3 percent, to $478.4 million, as sales of knee implants rose 4 percent and sales of extremity implants grew 25 percent. Revenue from hip implant devices was unchanged from a year ago, and dental implant sales declined 2 percent.

Biomet said revenue from fixation products slipped 3 percent, to $59.4 million, and spinal device revenue was unchanged at $57.9 million. Sports medicine revenue rose 15 percent.

Biomet said it lost $17.8 million in the quarter, down from $22.8 million a year ago.

Biomet, headquartered in Warsaw, was a publicly traded company until 2007, when it was purchased by a group of private equity firms.

Its publicly traded peers include Zimmer Holdings Inc., Stryker Corp., Wright Medical Group Inc. and Smith & Nephew Inc. Stryker is scheduled to report its third-quarter results on Tuesday, while other companies in the group will make their reports in late October and early November.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT