IBJNews

Biomet sales rise, but slower than expected

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana-based medical device maker Biomet Inc. said Wednesday its sales rose 2 percent in the first quarter, slower than the privately held company had expected.

Biomet's quarterly results are considered an indicator on the state of the orthopedic device industry because it reports results before most of its competitors. The largest publicly traded orthopedic device makers report their results starting next week.

Biomet said its revenue rose to $640.7 million over the three months ended Aug. 31, from $630.1 million a year ago. Excluding the effects of foreign currency exchanges, its revenue improved 3 percent.

The company said its U.S. sales rose 5 percent, to $419.1 million, while European sales fell 11 percent. Its international sales rose 11 percent. Most of Biomet's international sales are made in Canada, South America, Mexico and the Pacific Rim.

President and CEO Jeffrey Binder said its results were hurt by a decline in surgical procedures. Total revenue from sales of reconstructive products rose 3 percent, to $478.4 million, as sales of knee implants rose 4 percent and sales of extremity implants grew 25 percent. Revenue from hip implant devices was unchanged from a year ago, and dental implant sales declined 2 percent.

Biomet said revenue from fixation products slipped 3 percent, to $59.4 million, and spinal device revenue was unchanged at $57.9 million. Sports medicine revenue rose 15 percent.

Biomet said it lost $17.8 million in the quarter, down from $22.8 million a year ago.

Biomet, headquartered in Warsaw, was a publicly traded company until 2007, when it was purchased by a group of private equity firms.

Its publicly traded peers include Zimmer Holdings Inc., Stryker Corp., Wright Medical Group Inc. and Smith & Nephew Inc. Stryker is scheduled to report its third-quarter results on Tuesday, while other companies in the group will make their reports in late October and early November.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Sometimes majority rule is a good thing, such as in the decision of whether or not to unionize. From the comments I read on this topic, I get the impression that people think that a union forces itself into a workplace against the will of the workers. A union is only established if supported by a majority of the workplace's workers. And if a majority of the workers disapprove of the union, they can also vote to have it removed. But you can't expect to run a union where services are provided to all, but dues are voluntary just the same as you couldn't run a government that way. What would happen if payment of taxes were optional? Most people wouldn't pay, it's human nature, and government would collapse. If a union isn't serving its workers well, the membership can vote in new leadership. Right-to-work is simply a strategy to decimate unions and decrease the wage structure for workers to increase profits for corporations. Unfortunately, the strategy has been successful at gaining allies among workers by turning them against one another and by appealing to patriotic terms such as "freedom", "liberty" and "rights". America will not be a better place for the majority of citizens if and when the unions have been eradicated by the rich.

  2. I moved to Indy 15 years ago and have been a dedicated WIBC listener every day on my drive to and from work. Loved Steve Simpson. Can't stand Tony Katz. The WIBC brass and Programming Director are idiots. I now listen to other stations.

  3. From the story: “I don’t know that you’re seeing this type of cumulative sports success anywhere else in the country right now,” said Milt Thompson, an Indianapolis sports attorney and marketer, who serves on the board of the Indianapolis Indians and the Capital Improvement Board, which manages the city’s sports venues. ----- Do we really want the fox guarding the henhouse? We shouldn't be surprised if the Indians get a deal in a few years like the Pacers have.

  4. Didn't we just go through the same with hospital over-construction? Suddenly Indiana had some of the highest hospital rates. Not surprisingly the over-construction led to over-saturation and the inevitable cost cutting measures by hospitals.

  5. The value of any company is what a buyer will pay for it. As such, values are subjective. If you had 10 consultants they would give you 10 different values. It has to be impossible to prove unless government has specific e-mails indicating they purposely inflated the value. Surely, the government will extort the $10 to $15 M it is going to cost to defend then go away. What a crock!

ADVERTISEMENT