IBJNews

Biomet sales rise, but slower than expected

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana-based medical device maker Biomet Inc. said Wednesday its sales rose 2 percent in the first quarter, slower than the privately held company had expected.

Biomet's quarterly results are considered an indicator on the state of the orthopedic device industry because it reports results before most of its competitors. The largest publicly traded orthopedic device makers report their results starting next week.

Biomet said its revenue rose to $640.7 million over the three months ended Aug. 31, from $630.1 million a year ago. Excluding the effects of foreign currency exchanges, its revenue improved 3 percent.

The company said its U.S. sales rose 5 percent, to $419.1 million, while European sales fell 11 percent. Its international sales rose 11 percent. Most of Biomet's international sales are made in Canada, South America, Mexico and the Pacific Rim.

President and CEO Jeffrey Binder said its results were hurt by a decline in surgical procedures. Total revenue from sales of reconstructive products rose 3 percent, to $478.4 million, as sales of knee implants rose 4 percent and sales of extremity implants grew 25 percent. Revenue from hip implant devices was unchanged from a year ago, and dental implant sales declined 2 percent.

Biomet said revenue from fixation products slipped 3 percent, to $59.4 million, and spinal device revenue was unchanged at $57.9 million. Sports medicine revenue rose 15 percent.

Biomet said it lost $17.8 million in the quarter, down from $22.8 million a year ago.

Biomet, headquartered in Warsaw, was a publicly traded company until 2007, when it was purchased by a group of private equity firms.

Its publicly traded peers include Zimmer Holdings Inc., Stryker Corp., Wright Medical Group Inc. and Smith & Nephew Inc. Stryker is scheduled to report its third-quarter results on Tuesday, while other companies in the group will make their reports in late October and early November.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT