IBJNews

Fort Wayne's Wyss tops ranking of business-friendly lawmakers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

State Sen. Thomas Wyss, R-Fort Wayne, is the General Assembly’s most business-friendly legislator, according to the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. And House Speaker Pat Bauer, D-South Bend, is the least.

Last week, the state chamber released its annual “Legislative Vote Analysis.” It evaluates how closely votes from each of Indiana’s 50 state senators and 100 representatives matched the chamber’s published agenda. Legislators whose votes match the chamber’s positions 70 percent of the time or more are eligible for endorsement by the chamber’s political action committee “Indiana Business for Responsive Government.”
 

Tom Wyss mug Wyss
Pat Bauer mug Bauer

Wyss’ votes aligned with the chamber’s positions 93 percent of the time in 2010, according to the analysis, and 90 percent of the time during the last two years. On the other extreme, Bauer voted in alignment with the chamber just 33 percent of the time in 2010, and 22 percent of the time during the last two years.

Republicans dominate the Indiana State Senate 33-17. By the chamber’s measure, of the 35 state senators that are pro-business, all but two of them are Republican. State Sens. John Broden, D-South Bend, and Sue Errington, D-Muncie, were the only exceptions. Broden’s 2010 score was 79 percent; Errington’s 81 percent.

Democrats hold a 52-48 majority in the Indiana House of Representatives. All of its Republican members scored 70 percent or more on the chamber’s scale, but none of its Democrats did. State Rep. Phil Pflum, D-Milton, scored highest among Democrats, voting in alignment with the chamber’s agenda 62 percent of the time in 2010.

In the Legislative Vote Analysis’ introduction, Chamber President Kevin Brinegar pointed out that the chamber couldn’t secure several of its priorities this year, such as local government consolidation or a ban against allowing workers to leave firearms locked in their vehicle trunks on company parking lots. But the chamber got the biggest item on its wish list: a delay in the payroll tax hike meant to shore up Indiana’s insolvent Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT