BlackBerry woes hamper sales for BrightPoint, analysts say

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ongoing issues with major customer BlackBerry helped push BrightPoint’s sales roughly $250 million below Wall Street estimates in the third quarter, analysts say.

Ingram Micro Inc., which acquired BrightPoint in October 2012 for $840 million, last week reported $1.1 billion in quarterly revenue for Indianapolis-based BrightPoint, which provides logistics and distribution services to the mobile device industry.

The results disappointed Wall Street analysts, which had projected around $1.3 billion for the BrightPoint division during the quarter. The results also represented a significant dip from revenue of $1.3 billion in the second quarter.

“While the revenue performance in the BrightPoint segment was a surprise, we believe the issues are temporary and can improve,” Barclays Research analysts summarized in a note to investors on Friday.

Santa Ana, Calif.-based Ingram does not report profit for BrightPoint, which now operates as Ingram Micro Mobility.

Analysts pinpointed Blackberry and its own woes as major contributors to the BrightPoint sales slump. The fortunes of BlackBerry—a major customer—are somewhat intertwined with those of BrightPoint.

The mobile device maker reported in September that it lost $965 million in its last quarter after sales plunged 45 percent from the same quarter a year earlier.

During an after-market conference call on Thursday, analysts repeatedly asked Ingram Micro’s executives about BlackBerry’s impact on BrightPoint, which accounted for about 10 percent of Ingram’s $10.2 billion in sales in the third quarter.

William Humes, Ingram’s chief financial officer and chief operating officer, quickly noted that BlackBerry is not BrightPoint's biggest customer. The “lion’s share” of sales, he said, belongs to Samsung, which reported a $7.06 billion profit in its third quarter.

Humes and CEO Alain Monie referred to a manufacturer that caused a hit to sales, especially in Asia, but they did not reveal who it was. Analysts believe that company was BlackBerry.

Ingram’s overall profit surged to $78.9 million, or 50 cents per share, from $53.3 million, or 35 cents per share, in the third quarter of 2012. During trading on Monday morning, shares of Ingram Micro were down 2.7 percent since the firm reported its third-quarter results last week.

Ingram Micro's revenue missed the target, according to Raymond James analysts, but “we note that the company is clearly making a conscious decision to trade revenue for profitability, which we see as better than the alternative.”

BrightPoint employed more than 1,000 workers in central Indiana before Ingram bought it.

Ingram said in 2012 that the deal would save $55 million via “cost synergies and efficiencies” by 2014. After the acquisition, BrightPoint moved its administrative offices in Indianapolis into a distribution facility it operates in Plainfield. The company has remained silent on its local headcount.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now