The Dose

Welcome to The Dose, which tackles the finances behind local health care and life sciences and points to the most interesting national analysis. Your host is J.K. Wall.

Health Care & Life Sciences / Life Science & Biotech

What health care really needs is a full-meal deal

April 28, 2014
Comments Print Reprints
Share More
/ Text Size+

On a daily basis, millions of Americans go into restaurants of all types and order package deals on food.

“Do you want fries with that?” has become so common, it’s a cliché.

But it’s also a poignant symbol of how business works throughout our society—if you bundle multiple items together into a package, you get a deal. It’s true in fast food, grocery stores, cable-Internet-telephone services, and innumerable other things.

But not in health care. If McDonald's charged its customers like the U.S. health care system does, not only would it make them pay separately for a hamburger, fries and drink, it would bill a different price for the meat, lettuce, pickle, mayo, ketchup, bun, wrapper, cup, soda and ice.

In fact, this piecemeal method of charging for services is so ingrained in the health care system that health insurers and third-party administrators that handle employer health benefits are, in many cases, incapable of processing package deals for their clients.

And doing bundled payments with the federal Medicare program was essentially illegal—until just recently.

“Federal statutes have historically outlawed the level of collaboration necessary to establish an effective bundled payment program. However, recent guidance from the Office of the Inspector General and waivers from [the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] have cracked the door slightly ajar. It is still a complex web of legal requirements,” wrote Gene Ford, a spokesman for Indiana University Health, in an email about IU Health’s plans to launch a bundled price for knee and hip replacement surgeries this year.

I wrote this past weekend about recent moves by IU Health and other local hospitals to offer bundled prices on joint replacements. There are similar efforts under way across the country, mainly focused on orthopedic and cardiac surgeries.

But not until health insurance plans—both governmental and private—give much greater freedom to doctors and hospitals to “repackage and reprice” their services—like companies from Applebee’s to Apple do all the time—will health care costs have a chance to come down, argues health economist John Goodman.

“Everyone on the provider side should be encouraged to make Medicare a better offer,” Goodman wrote in 2011 when Medicare launched its bundled payment program for heart and joint surgeries. “Medicare should accept these offers provided that (1) the total cost to government does not increase, (2) patient quality of care does not decrease and (3) the provider proposes a reasonable method of assuring that (1) and (2) have been satisfied.”

Goodman thinks Medicare’s program comes up short because it prescribes the bundle of services that can be provided. Others disagree, arguing that the Medicare experiments are a first step that will lead to major savings.

Goodman offers several examples of the kind of package deals that have been successful—and ought to be replicated.

Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania offers a bundle that includes heart surgery AND a 90-day guarantee of the outcome. But Medicare and private health insurers rules don’t pay for 90-day guarantees, so Geisinger’s guarantee is rare.

Or the pharmacists in North Carolina that dispense diabetes medicines AND provide primary care counseling to help patients adhere to the medicines and change their lifestyles. But Medicare and private health insurers don't pay pharmacists to provide this counseling, so most do not.

Or Dr. Jeffrey Brenner, the now-famous doctor in New Jersey who has saved Medicare billions of dollars by providing primary care AND social worker services that prevent hugely expensive hospitalizations. But Medicare and private health insurers don't pay doctors for acting as social workers, so most do not.

Medicare, and private insurers, are starting to encourage doctors and hospitals to hire social workers, partner with pharmacists and focus more on outcomes by the creation of accountable care organizations. These ACOs get to share in the savings created by these additional services.

But most hospital executives aren’t eager to form ACOs. And nearly half of ACOs haven’t been able to achieve savings.

If those trends continue, there could be a substantial chunk of the health care system that chugs along using the same old, fee-for-service payment system—which nearly everyone blames for the ever-growing health care spending in our country.

Until doctors and hospitals make a whole lot more headway—or, perhaps, more accurately, are allowed to make more headway—in offering package deals, it’s hard to foresee major progress on containing out-of-control health care costs.

ADVERTISEMENT
Comments powered by Disqus