IBJNews

Bloomington council OKs revised parking meter plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Downtown Bloomington could have hundreds more parking meters by this fall under a plan approved by the City Council.

The council voted 6-3 late Wednesday in favor of the plan, which was revised following opposition from local business owners worried that the meters will hurt their businesses. The plan also includes more free parking spaces and lower parking garage rates in the college town.

Mayor Mark Kruzan originally proposed installing 1,200 parking meters along streets in downtown Bloomington at a rate of $1 an hour, with 179 free spaces. The version passed late Wednesday raised the number of free spaces to a minimum of 400. That includes three free parking lots and two city garages. Currently, the city has only a few meters downtown, city spokesman Adam Wason said Friday.

The cost of part-time parking garage permits for downtown employees will also fall from $32.50 to $25 a month.

The Herald-Times reports that the city will try to recoup some of the reduced potential revenue by creating an escalating system for parking fines. And after the first three hours in some of the free parking slots, drivers will be charged 25 cents per 30 minutes.

"The message is not revenue, it's behavior," Kruzan said.

Fines for parking violations will start at $20 a ticket, but anyone who does not pay within seven calendar days will owe the city $40. Anyone who gets a second ticket in the same year will have to pay $40 — $80 if not paid within seven days. A third ticket, and any after that, would cost $100 each. But anyone who gets more than one ticket on the same day would pay the same fine for each ticket.

Kruzan said the city was on track to install the meters by Indiana University's fall semester. Officials prefer individual metering rather than pay stations covering multiple spaces.

Council member finished revising the proposal in just a couple of hours, which concerned downtown business owners and the Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce who said they didn't have enough time to digest the changes.

Some council members expressed concern over the plan's impact on the poor, and John McGuigan of the Bloomington Coalition Against Parking Meters warned that his group would oppose the re-election of those who voted to pass the plan.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • How?
    Is the City of Bloomington bringing in an out-of-state company to pay for the meters/installation, and then giving them a large portion of the revenue for the next 50 years while hamstringing their ability to change their streets in ways that might result in removing parking spaces/meters in the future? Or do they have some alternative to the Indianapolis/Chicago way?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT