IBJNews

Board member asks for old Indiana school standards

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A State Board of Education member formally requested Friday that an education panel abandon a proposed overhaul of Indiana's education standards and instead recommend that the state's previous benchmarks be reinstated in classrooms this fall.

Board member Andrea Neal said state education leaders working to replace the contentious Common Core standards are considering an inadequate replacement. She instead wants to restore the benchmarks used before Indiana adopted the national standards in 2010.

The Education Roundtable, which includes many business and education leaders, is expected to vote Monday on the proposed new standards. A law signed by Republican Gov. Mike Pence in March gives the State Board of Education until July to approve new guidelines, but a final vote is scheduled for April 28.

Legislation passed last spring started the process of evaluating new standards.

Neal has been pushing for months to reinstate the previous Indiana benchmarks and admitted there's been little support from other board members, but she said flaws in the current proposal are too substantial for it to be salvaged.

"If we approve these standards we will take a needless step backwards at a time when our children deserve better," Neal wrote in an email to one Roundtable member. "We cannot say we want to build student preparedness for college and careers — especially in the increasingly valuable STEM fields — and then enact standards with mathematical errors and other glaring deficiencies."

But board member Brad Oliver said although Indiana's former standards were rated well, too many students needed remediation in college despite passing state tests. He also said Neal's emails disregard the approval process meant to properly vet new benchmarks.

"I do not think at this stage in the process it's appropriate for a board member to lobby the Education Roundtable one way or another," Oliver said. "I respect work of the Roundtable. I respect them enough to wait and listen to what they have to say on Monday."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Participants Have Made a Mess
    Well said Terry. After reading about the situation over the last year and viewing some of the Board meeting via video I have to wonder if anyone on the Board, including Ms. Neal, as well as the Governor's staff knows what they are doing. The Tea Party spokeswoman doesn't seem to know anything either other than she is opposed to anything that has any element of the common core. A sad state of affairs for sure.
  • Board to the Classroom
    I would suggest that the State Board of Education Members spend some time in the classrooms of schools in Indiana. Talk with teachers, students, and parents about Education Standards. Listening to lobbyists is a sure way to fail the test of this board's ability to grasp the real issues associated with our education system.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Again, Maria.... how much are YOU contributing? The man doesn't HAVE to give a red cent! What don't you get about that? And, I know this might actually require some actual "facts", but can you please point me to the parking garage that the city gave to him?

  2. Another internet tuff guy I see. And what would the basis of taking the person to jail? If they were drunk, yea. But if not, there would be no jailable offense. All these gestapo, Nazi, jackboots are running SCARED. When the SHTF in this country who's side are you going to be on? The citzens, or the establishment? Better make up your mind quick because it's not far off. I would rather be trying to make friends than enemies. But no worries my "friend", God will take care of you and your likes in good time. It tells us that in the bible. If you stand, support and help carry out the plans of evil rulers, you will NOT be spared the wrath of God. That simple. All you can do is repent now and ask God to forgive you.

  3. Yes, Ersal, thank you for donating a whole $75,000, while the city gives you a parking garage for free and is going to pay for a multi million dollar stadium for you. I'd be donating money too if I was on welfare.

  4. I live and work in Broad Ripple and agree 100% that the traffic is not a significant problem. It can be slow at some times, but hey...this is an urban area. As for the development itself...HOORAY. Office and retail development brings people during the day, something that our community needs much more of. Thank goodness people are finally waking up to take advantage of the serene White River views. The BRVA land us committee endorsed the project because they know how these kind of projects help offset the cries of "too many bars". Pray that this development, and the proposed major investment by Browning, move forward. And remember Good Earth, these will mean hundreds of daytime people - potential shoppers for your store.

  5. Under current, previous existing law, this new law would be unconstitutional. Not that supposedly having to have a driver's license to drive isn't in the first place.

ADVERTISEMENT