IBJNews

LOU'S VIEWS: Both sides now

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

More and more, political discourse in the United States dictates that one side is purely good and the other purely evil. Thankfully, our theaters are more sophisticated—and more entertaining—than our political commentators.

Witness, for example, three recently opened shows that entertainingly explore the good in the bad and the bad in the good.
 

ae-main-1col-1col.jpg Dr. Jekyll (Ryan Artzberger) is haunted by one of many Mr. Hydes at the Indiana Repertory Theatre. (Photo/Zach Rosing)

First, the obvious: The Indiana Repertory Theatre’s production of “Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde” (running through Sept. 30). As with the original Robert Louis Stevenson novel—and its numerous film and theater adaptations— playwright Jeffrey Hatcher’s version concerns a doc’s efforts to separate the good and bad in human nature, using himself as a guinea pig.

Ryan Artzberger plays a solid, searching Jekyll. But rather than have the same actor play Hyde, the alter ego is handled by multiple actors, depending on who isn’t covering another part in the scene. When it doesn’t quite work, it feels like just a theatrical convenience. But when it does work, it allows us to witness Jekyll’s horror at his own (as Hyde) actions and for multiple Hydes to give us some idea of what the torment is like in Jekyll’s head.

The original novel had little in the way of female characters, and adaptations of the material tend to, for good reason, flesh out those roles. Here, much of the power of the ending depends on our believing that chambermaid Elizabeth truly loves Hyde. Unfortunately, bold-but-not-successful casting, costuming and hair choices turn what could be a tough, vulnerable, street-smart, full-bodied character into a series of inconsistencies. Elizabeth could pass for the coolest woman at GenCon, but doesn’t fit into the rest of the production.

Still, the stage centerpiece—a spiral staircase that conveniently resembles a strand of DNA—is a hint that, rather than just an evening of cheap thrills,

this production aims to go a little deeper. And it does, making “Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde” a marked improvement over last year’s IRT season-opening would-be thriller “Dracula.”
__________

I’m not sure Mr. Hyde himself could square off against Mama Rose and win. The stage mother of all stage mothers, Rose is a horror Robert Louis Stevenson couldn’t have dreamed up: a shameless, single-minded, utensil-stealing, bulldozing bully insensitive to the feelings and needs of those who love her.

In order for a production of “Gypsy” to work, we have to be both drawn to Rose and repulsed by her. We have to understand both why boyfriend Herbie sticks around and why daughter June leaves. We have to be unable to imagine how anyone could want to be with her after the pathetic end-of-act-one display … then completely understand, early in act two, why they do stay with her.
 

ae-gypsy-15col.jpg Alexandra Young (Dainty June), Judy Fitzgerald (Rose), Jeff Stockberger (Mr. Goldstone), Paul Hansen (Herbie), and David Michael Cress (Yonkers) praise their new vaudeville booking in “Mr. Goldstone,” from Actors Theatre of Indiana’s “Gypsy.” (Photo/Julie Curry)

Actors Theatre of Indiana’s production (running through Sept. 30) doesn’t bring much new to the table of this classic. It’s got a solid Rose in Judy Fitzgerald, a worthy Herbie in Paul Hansen, and an appealing group of kids for the cheesy vaudeville numbers. What it lacks is a vision. Scenes and songs play, but characters often don’t seem to be in the same show. And while the compact Studio Theatre isn’t a liability, it isn’t an asset, either. Rather than affording the chance to see “Gypsy” cast in a new, up-close-and-personal light, it’s simply “Gypsy” in a small space and on a tight budget.

Still, it’s “Gypsy,” with the magical harmonic convergence of never-better Jule Styne music; Stephen Sondheim’s playful, character-driven lyrics; and Arthur Laurents’ smart, rich book. A good production is good enough.
__________

Meanwhile, at Beef & Boards Dinner Theatre, one of the few successful musicals with unredeemed, despicable characters is getting a sturdy revival.

“Chicago” centers on a pair of murderers with unquenchable hunger for fame and attention. Why do we care about them? In large part because of a knockout Kander and Ebb score and solid dancing. Here, the leads are fine, too. Deb Wims, whom I previously knew primarily as a dancer, starts off overly cartoony but ultimately gets the role right by giving us a Roxy who need not be all that likable nor the center of the show. Curt Dale Clark is a bland Billy Flynn, but Marisa Rivera effectively captures the arrogant desperation of Velma Kelly. Eddie Curry is suitably ordinary as milquetoast Amos.

And then there’s Mama Morton.


ae-chicago-1col.jpg The six merry murderesses of the Cook County Jail perform the “Cell Block Tango,” in Beef & Boards Dinner Theatre’s production of “Chicago.” (Photo courtesy of Beef & Boards Dinner Theatre)

The opportunistic prison matron is a supporting part, to be sure, but Alene Robertson manages to make the most of it while never hogging the spotlight. Hilarious even before she speaks a word and savoring every line once she does chime in, Robertson makes “When You’re Good to Mama” and “Class” two of the show’s highlights. (If only B&B’s lackluster summer production of “Nunsense” had her to spruce it up.) Here’s hoping we’ll see her on area stages again soon.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT