Daily newspapers on Thursday filed a motion seeking to unseal search warrant documents related to the federal investigation
of Indianapolis businessman Tim Durham and Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co.
An attorney for the Akron Beacon
Journal and The Indianapolis Star filed the motion, citing “significant overriding public interest in
the disclosure of the search warrant documents.”
“Transparency in the investigation into Mr. Durham’s
financial affairs can only serve to enhance the public’s faith in its government,” according to a memorandum filed
by the newspapers Thursday afternoon. “The sealing of such documents only serves to undermine the integrity of the judicial
process and enhance the perception that Mr. Durham’s political connections will save him.”
FBI agents
on Nov. 24 executed search warrants at Durham’s Indianapolis office and at Fair’s Akron headquarters. Agents hauled
away computer equipment and bankers boxes full of documents. Investigators have refused to provide information on the warrants,
saying they are sealed.
The raids occurred one month after IBJ published an investigative story that raised
questions about whether Fair Finance had the financial wherewithal to repay Ohio investors who had purchased nearly $200 million
in investment certificates.
The story reported that, since Durham bought the consumer-loan business in 2002, he
had used it almost like a personal bank to fund a range of business interests, some of them unsuccessful. The story noted
that he and related parties owe Fair more than $168 million.
Court papers filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office
in Indianapolis on Nov. 24 allege Fair operated as a Ponzi scheme, using money from new investors to pay what it owed prior
investors, thereby “lulling the earlier victims into believing that their money was being [handled] responsibly.”
Durham, a major contributor to many Republican political candidates, has denied doing anything improper.

















IBJ Conversations
9 Comments
Add Comment
That doesn't provide many details about the IndyMedia situation. IndyMedia was served by the DOJ (regardless of what party is in charge, you don't need a designation of R, D, I, to push people around), demanding a list of IP Addresses to see where they were connecting from: Were they connecting from within Indiana and could someone do some homework to track them down?) in addition to user information and the gag order.
IP Addresses aren't always a good way to track people down.
The first thing IndyMedia did - and it's what everyone facing this should do - is contact the EFF. They (EFF) looked everything over, indicated it was incomplete/inappropriate; i.e., "tell them to pound sand." There was a feeble attempt or two to improve upon their bluff, then the DOJ suddenly disappeared like a fart in the wind.
My guess has been that they didn't want to go by the book because they didn't have enough information to show cause. Fake it, bully people around a bit, see if you can get away with it. After all, how many people are going to resist these guys without explicit understanding re: what they were trying to do?
That doesn't provide many details about the IndyMedia situation. IndyMedia was served by the DOJ (regardless of what party is in charge, you don't need a designation of R, D, I, to push people around), demanding a list of IP Addresses to see where they were connecting from: Were they connecting from within Indiana and could someone do some homework to track them down?) in addition to user information and the gag order.
IP Addresses aren't always a good way to track people down.
The first thing IndyMedia did - and it's what everyone facing this should do - is contact the EFF. They (EFF) looked everything over, indicated it was incomplete/inappropriate; i.e., "tell them to pound sand." There was a feeble attempt or two to improve upon their bluff, then the DOJ suddenly disappeared like a fart in the wind.
My guess has been that they didn't want to go by the book because they didn't have enough information to show cause. Fake it, bully people around a bit, see if you can get away with it. After all, how many people are going to resist these guys without explicit understanding re: what they were trying to do?
Being a 77-year-old retiree (my last 13 years were spent at Fair Finance in the sales finance collection department) and an investor at Fair Finance, I am surely surprised and shocked by the debacle (''Fair leaves investment customers out in cold,'' Dec. 8).
Working during the Don Fair era and retiring with a fully paid, lump-sum company pension was a delight. Fair is the finest businessman I have ever met, a man of Christian character and integrity.
Apparently the new owners lack the attributes always exhibited by Don Fair and his staff. Tim Durham should apologize and amend his policies, if indeed his actions and motives are proved in court.
He has already caused much criticism to be brought against the trusted name of Fair Financial Services.
Isn't it ironic that the government would investigate a company that survived the Great Depression and many recessions and hard times, while the banks and savings and loans are failing despite ''government insurance''?
My faith tells me that ''God works all things together for good to those that love him and are called according to his purpose.''
My sympathy and prayers go out to all investors, Fair Finance employees, and the Fair family that justice will be done for all, and that God's will is done in all.
Robert L. Rosnack
Akron