IBJNews

Buffett-owned residential brokerage network to have presence here

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The name Berkshire Hathaway, synonymous with business icon Warren Buffett, is positioned to become a well-known residential real estate brand here following Buffett's purchase Oct. 26 of one of the country's largest real estate brokerage networks.

Omaha-based Berkshire Hathaway Inc., through its HomeServices of America unit, bought a majority stake in the Prudential and Real Living real estate franchises from Brookfield Asset Management and announced it will begin converting agencies to the new Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices brand next year.

Locally, the deal will affect two of the city's 25 largest brokerages: Prudential Indiana Realty Group, the city's second-largest with more than 300 Indianapolis-area agents; and Real Living Realty Partners, the smallest agency on the list.

Prudential Indiana, which has 14 offices and 450 agents from Lafayette to Evansville, was started in 1980 as Century 21 Realty Group One by Kevin Kirkpatrick and John Dick. They switched the franchise from Century 21 to Prudential in April 2010 and can keep the Prudential brand name for 10 more years if they choose to.

Kirkpatrick said he and Dick will watch how the conversion to Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices goes at other Prudential affiliates that are likely to make the switch sooner. HomeServices of America, the nation's second-largest owner of brokerages, already counts among its holdings several agencies with the Prudential brand.

Regardless of when they take the new name, Kirkpatrick and Dick expect their company to benefit from new technology systems they'll have access to under new ownership. The biggest benefit, however, is less tangible: the vote of confidence in their industry that comes with Warren Buffett making an investment.

"The people at Berkshire Hathaway are strategic thinkers, and they see a long-term growth in this business," Kirkpatrick said.

Bradley Litz, a broker and owner of the local Real Living agency in Carmel, said he and his partners are waiting to find out when they will convert to the Berkshire Hathaway brand, but they're happy with the change.

"Berkshire Hathaway is a fantastic brand ... it gives you instant credibility," Litz said. "We're as excited as can be."

Litz, his mother, Margie Litz, and Evans and Jane Wells, started their agency last year as a franchise of Real Living, which didn't have a presence here but has huge affiliates in Chicago and on the east and west coasts.

The agency has 12 brokers and one office, in Carmel, but is opening a second office next month at 749 Massachusetts Ave., where it will add six brokers. Litz said the downtown office will give his firm high visibility in a central location.

Terms of the deal between HomeServices of America and Brookfield Asset Management were not disclosed.

HomeServices' affiliates employ more than 16,000 agents in 21 states and closed almost $32 billion in residential real estate sales in 2011. Brookfield Asset Management's more than 53,000 Prudential and Real Living agents generated more than $72 billion in residential real estate sales last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT