IBJNews

Building rentals help school district make ends meet

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If Franklin Community Schools' performing arts director can entice more dance companies to rent the high school's performing arts center, he can make more money for the district.

Doug Corliss has been making calls and sending emails to local and national dance companies since January, asking them to consider using the 6-year-old performing arts center about 20 miles south of Indianapolis for their shows and competitions.

He promotes the center's 918 seats, the size of the stage and nearby Franklin restaurants and hotels the companies and their audiences can use during performance weekends.

Companies that Corliss persuades to rent the performing arts center will pay between $6,000 and $22,000 to use it for a weekend. That money can be used to help pay school bills.

Corliss, who was hired in October, is in charge of running the lights, sound, stage and other elements of the performing arts center. He works with high school students interested in learning about how to run a theater.

But his biggest responsibility is raising money for the district through performing arts center and middle school rentals.

Franklin is planning to raise $120,000 by renting the performing arts center and middle school auditorium this year — six times what the district made in rental fees four years ago.

Corliss is expected to earn between $200,000 and $250,000 for the district's general fund by 2015, executive director of finance Jeff Mercer said.

Commercial groups who use the performing arts center are charged $300 per hour for rental and $35 per hour for any custodians needed. Churches and other nonprofit groups pay $150 per hour.

At the middle school, the costs are $200 or $100 per hour, depending on the use.

So far Franklin has eight groups scheduled to use the performing arts center this year, and most of them are dance companies. Corliss said dancers are the easiest to book because Franklin has the kind of venue they need.

"It's like, 'Hey, I need a facility,' 'Oh, we have a theater.' Boom, you book it," he said.

The money made through the performing arts center and middle school rentals goes to the district's general fund; $62,175 of it pays for Corliss' salary and benefits as well as performing arts supplies and marketing materials, Mercer said.

The rentals currently booked will bring in $106,804, but Corliss said he's in negotiations with other groups that will bring in additional money.

Franklin isn't the only Johnson County school that rents its buildings. Center Grove made $104,000 in rental and utility fees in 2010, including $40,000 paid by a church renting West Grove Elementary School.

Nineveh-Hensley-Jackson has fees in place to recoup utility and custodial from groups who want to rent buildings, but the district doesn't look to rentals as a moneymaker, Superintendent Matt Prusiecki said.

Mercer said the district would like to bring in $200,000 to $250,000 in annual rental fees by 2015. When that happens, the school district can begin earmarking the income for specific projects. Corliss' job is to meet the goal.

"My job here is not to cost the corporation money, it's to make the corporation money," he said.

Along with dance companies, Corliss is hoping to reach rental agreements with more churches in the area.

Journey Church has been using the auditorium, a classroom and a custodian at the middle school since 2009, and their contract with Franklin expires in August.

Corliss is looking into making sure the church stays and has talked with two other churches interested in renting as well.

Franklin has avoided having long-term contracts with churches holding Sunday services in the buildings, but Corliss said he plans to speak with Superintendent David Clendening about whether that will continue.

"I know that's been stated but we are going to have a meeting on the district's philosophy on that," Corliss said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Rental
    So not for profits get the tax subsidized center for less...seems like discrimination considering taxpayers built it.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT