IBJNews

Business bank reports second-quarter loss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The restructuring of a real estate loan to reflect a decrease in its appraisal value caused Indiana Business Bancorp to report a loss of $484,678 in the second quarter.

The Indianapolis-based parent of Indiana Business Bank said on Friday that the loss was primarily due to a provision expense of $706,250 charged during the quarter. As a result of the reappraisal, the book value of the restructured loan was written down to reflect the current value of the real estate, the bank said.

The loss translated to 32 cents per share, compared to a profit of $37,907, or 3 cents per share, during the second quarter of 2009.

Net-interest income from loans in the second quarter declined by 9.7 percent compared with the same time last year. The $70,823 reduction, to $732,242, reflects a smaller loan portfolio. The value of total loans outstanding as of June 30 was almost $4 million lower than in the year-ago period.

The bank said the contraction of the portfolio follows management’s decision to exit relationships with customers with higher credit-risk profiles.

“We continue to manage our non-performing assets in order to return them to performing status, by working with borrowers in restructuring or renegotiating debt, or some other satisfactory resolution,” Indiana Business Bank President and CEO James S. Young said in a prepared statement.

Young said most of the problem loans were made between 2005 and 2007.

The bank’s allowance for loan losses represented 2.2 percent of total loans, which compares favorably to competitors, the bank said. Its $1.5 million allowance for loans losses, however, grew 20 percent, from $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2009.

Deposits increased by more than 4 percent, to $73 million, compared with the same time last year.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT