IBJNews

Business equipment tax headed toward delay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawmakers considering a cut to Indiana's tax on business equipment might leave the matter to a summer study committee, a move that would delay any action by at least a year.

House Republicans, who have proposed allowing counties to decide whether they will cut the tax, made their pitch to the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee on Tuesday.

But Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said the issue might be too complicated for this year's short legislative session. Kenley said many of the people who would be affected by such a cut, mostly local leaders, should be brought into the discussion.

"I'm wondering if this discussion isn't more complicated than we think it is and we don't need all those people at the table," Kenley said during a hearing. "And maybe the smart thing to do is to back up and pursue this and try to get it right. I'm just not sure we really got to the bottom of the whole issue here, in terms of where Indiana wants to go."

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said Tuesday that the issue has already been highly vetted by lawmakers and some sort of cut needs to happen this year.

"We've been dealing with that issue in the House for three years. We've studied it to death. We know the effects," Bosma said. "Our plan, which is totally an option for communities, is geared just to the result of our review of this for three years."

House and Senate Republicans have advanced widely differing ways for cutting the tax. The Senate Republican plan, which proposes eliminating the tax for small businesses and cutting the state's corporate income tax from 6.5 percent to 4.9 percent, also calls for the creation of a committee to study the issue.

The proposals respond to Gov. Mike Pence's suggestion that the state phase out the equipment tax completely. Supporters say a phase-out is needed to improve the state's competitiveness. Opponents have said it would hurt local governments.

David Bottorff, executive director of the Association of Indiana Counties, said he's pretty confident lawmakers will at least study the issue over the summer, but is unsure whether they will make any cuts this session.

"I think they're still considering a merger between [the House and Senate plans]," Bottorff said. "I think everybody agrees a study committee is going to happen and I think they're trying to come up with an agreeable solution that would take parts of [both plans]."

Pence spokeswoman Kara Brooks said the governor would not support delaying a tax cut until at least next year.

"We don't believe that Hoosiers want to wait as businesses make decisions today that could bring investment and new jobs to the state," Brooks said.

Bosma noted that the state's fiscal leaders had not reached a final compromise yet. Compromises on some of the session's toughest issues are typically hammered out during the final hours and days of the session, which is scheduled to end March 15.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • be careful
    Republicans controlling this state need to figure out how to reform bsuiness taxes so that they are low and fair, and that doesn't gut revenues for counties outside Marion. Indiana is one state including a lot of farmland and rust belt areas, not just the capital and its suburban collar. Public goods need to be properly funded and they shouldn't let the libertarian mentality carry them away. Atlas Shrugged is a long fantasy/ propaganda novel for college kids and a lame movie not a political philosophy.
  • Studies: Where's the Beef?
    I 2nd Marilyn's comments. I have yet to see any study that included details about the degree to which specific counties and cities will be impacted and how they might recover the lost revenue. Bosma says the situation has been studied multiple times; if so, perhaps he could use the studies to illustrate why eliminating this tax is so great for cities and counties and how it will stimulate jobs. It is getting to the point that everything the legislature does or proposes is directly related to creating jobs. OK, where are they now that "right to work" has passed, an income tax reduction has passed, etc. etc.?
  • Send it to summer school
    My preference is to kill it, but a summer study committee is good, too. For local governments and schools to lose another billion dollars in revenue is way too complex of an issue to spring on a short legislative session. Sure, economic development is good, but if the city can't plow its streets and the schools have no transportation or advanced courses, what business would want to relocate there? Take your time and make a smart decision.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT