IBJNews

Butler University to close 102-year-old dance academy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Butler University said Thursday that it plans to close its Jordan Academy of Dance, ending the 102-year-old program due to economic reasons.

The academy, which has more than 200 students, ages 3-17, will shut down May 31, the university said.

“Despite efforts to increase enrollment and boost revenue, the Jordan Academy of Dance is not a sustainable program and Butler University can no longer afford to subsidize the operation,” Butler announced in a written statement.

The academy, at 52nd Street and Boulevard Place in Indianapolis, teaches ballet, modern and jazz dance. It employs two full-time employees and six hourly workers.

The  affiliate dance school of the Butler Ballet and Butler University's Jordan College of Fine Arts is fully accredited by the National Association of Schools of Dance, one of only two pre-professional, pre-college dance programs in the nation to earn that status.

Butler said the academy “cannot compete with the number of for-profit dance schools in Indianapolis” and decided “that the money used to subsidize the academy would be better spent on its central mission: the nationally renowned undergraduate dance program.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Same Old Song
    Somehow, I think Butler University has decided that anything with "Jordan" in the name has to be removed or refashioned into something Arthur Jordan wouldn't recognize - starting with one of the most powerful university-operated radio stations then in existence - WAJC, which was part and parcel of the Arthur Jordan Conservatory of Music when it was acquired by Butler in 1951 (albeit with a much smaller transmitter and antenna than what it would have later). Now, WAJC is long gone, the college of MUSIC, nee' Conservatory, is now "Fine Arts", and now the college prep Academy will disappear...

    Oh, for the days gone by, when Bertha and her 400-foot tower helped locate Hinkle Fieldhouse...
  • Volunteering
    Unfortunately the university did not give the parents of the dance students any opportunity to "volunteer" to donate or raise the funds necessary to keep this top notch pre-professional dance curriculum going. There are many willing and capable parents who would gladly have done so. Butler University handled this very poorly and unprofessionally.
  • Volunteering?
    Is one of the disappointed people volunteering to fund the shortfall? Apparently the fees being paid don't cover the expenses. How long should the University cover such a loss? It's not generating students, necessarily (do all of the students from the Academy later attend Butler? I doubt it). There are an awful lot of dance studios in the city, and it's not Butler's mission to train pre-college dance students, while it is the mission of private, for-profit studios. I'd rather see the money spent on students at the University than on subsidizing a non-University program.
    • FYI
      It's those same "for profit" competitors that Jordan was providing a large # of dance roles in such performances as the Nutcracker (i.e. Dance Refinery) vs. their own students.
      Please explain that Ms. Jarvis.
    • long ago, memory
      Sad but better yet read the comment at the end. love you, dad
    • One parent's viewpoint
      it is regretable that an institution with the resources of one like Butler would mishandle an announcement such as this. The first inkling of financial unsustainability which was shared with the parents of these 200 students was done concurrently withthe closure announcement.
      Where were the discussions with their client base prior to a closure decision? Was any thought given to enlisting the intellectual and financial resources of those most affected by this decision? Very disappointing and unprofessional. Shame on the Administration for desecrating an institution with over 100+ years of history and impact in our community.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

    2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

    3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

    4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

    5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

    ADVERTISEMENT