Campaign money offer exposed in Indiana gay marriage fight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former state Republican Party chairman's pledge to provide campaign cash to protect House members who were considering voting against a constitutional gay marriage ban offers a rare look at the private power game that plays out on tough issues at the Statehouse.

Jim Kittle offered "unlimited" campaign help to House Speaker Brian Bosma as part of a push to defeat the proposed amendment, according to multiple people with direct knowledge of the discussion. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to disclose the private discussions.

Kittle withdrew his offer after Bosma questioned its legality, and it turns out the money wasn't needed after all. Only four House Republicans targeted by ban supporters face primary challenges, and changes to the proposed amendment's language will keep the issue off the ballot until at least 2016. But the back-room intrigue illustrates how election-year politics and campaign dollars shape some of the state's most important decisions.

The fight over the proposed marriage ban was always tinged by the 2014 election cycle, if not always on the surface. Voters must decide all 100 House seats this year, and supporters of the marriage ban used the threat of election challenges to try to secure a November vote on the issue.

Curt Smith, president of the Indiana Family Institute and a leading supporter of the ban, sent an email to supporters Jan. 28, shortly after the House stripped language barring civil unions from the proposed amendment. That move forced lawmakers to restart the amendment process and kept the issue off the November ballot.

The email listed Republicans who had voted to remove the civil unions ban and closed with a reminder that Indiana's primary election filing deadline was Feb. 7. It also included a link to the form needed to file for office.

"Please immediately contact the following 23 House Republicans who voted to gut the Marriage Amendment, by removing the second sentence, and let them know that when the Marriage Amendment comes back over from the Senate you want them to vote for the Marriage Amendment," Smith wrote. "The voters should be allowed to decide the future of marriage, not activists in Indianapolis funded by George Soros and other liberals from the coasts."

Bosma also has said a potential candidate notified him that he had been offered $500,000 from an out-of-state source to challenge the speaker in the May primary.

But Kittle's offer is the one that raised some eyebrows. Bosma first announced an offer of campaign dollars in a January news conference but did not identify the potential contributor.

"I received a pledge of unlimited campaign funding if I were to make this issue go away," Bosma announced.

Bosma said he rejected the offer and expressed concern that it might have violated state or federal law. He has worn his decision as a badge of pride throughout the session, telling reporters he does not bow to threats or intimidation.

Bosma told The Associated Press last week that he didn't think the offer constituted a crime. But the speaker, who has never said Kittle made the offer, acknowledged voicing some concerns.

"I did bring to that individual's attention what it sounded like he was saying and I think he was pretty concerned about it after he said it," Bosma said.

The money would have been an effective balm for House Republicans feeling vulnerable if they voted against the ban. Kittle has been a prolific Republican fundraiser for more than a decade and was Republican Gov. Mike Pence's finance chairman during his 2012 campaign.

Kittle, the owner of the Kittle's Furniture retail chain, was state GOP chairman from 2002 to 2006. He did not return calls seeking comment.

But the threat of election challenges hasn't materialized — at least not this year.


  • I'm sorry, but...
    I'm sorry, but Mr. Bosma most assuredly took a position on this issue. While he indicated early on that this issue was not of any primary importance, it very quickly became the most important issue he put forth during this session. How can he lie like that? He did not merely try to obscure the facts and the situation, he blatantly lied. How dare he? His actions clearly indicated that he was in the pockets of the political hacks and that he was bought, paid and sold...
  • Neither?
    Pat - perhaps Kittle's actions had nothing to do with pro- or anti-gay at all and he was simply concerned about a potentially toxic campaign issue for Republicans later this year. Others -- nothing was done here so there is nothing unethical or illegal. Had money actually changed hands them perhaps, but this was simply an idea that did not come to pass. Moving on...
  • It Is Republican Politics Not Ethics
    Pat - I think Mr. Kittle's actions were simply to limit the negative impact on the Indiana Republican brand and also avoid a fractious primary among Republican contenders. Regarding Bosma's ethics, he never took a stand on the marriage ban. Had he done so, this situation would not have festered so long and taken the legislature away from doing higher priority work.
  • Mr. Kittle
    Please excuse my ignorance concerning this bill , but were Mr. Kittles' actions meant to be pro or anti Gay in this case ?
  • GOP At It Again
    Well, another perfect example of corrupt and illegal activities on the part of the Repubicans.. Why aren't they ever prosecuted for this unethical behavior? They have always played dirty but to blatantly break ethics rules and nothing done is outrageous!
  • correction to previous post
    Mike Smith actually did read the article. I misunderstood Mr. Smith's post. My apologies.
  • Thank you Mike Smith
    .... for not reading the entire article and showing your ignorance.
  • Ethical?
    So the fact that he didn't take a private donor up on the offer of unlimited funding if he was challenged makes him ethical...I'm sure he will turn down the same $$ if donated by the faceless Super PAC's out there...the fact that he never mentioned Kittle by name might make a little difference I suppose, except that everone alreayd knows that's who it is, so it doesn't...I personally am skeptical of them all, and Bosma is near the top of the list...
  • An ethical Republican
    Glad to see that there are ethical republicans in Indiana. Thank you Brian Bosma.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

    2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

    3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

    4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

    5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.