IBJNews

Car-rental companies say higher tax will hurt locals, too

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposal by the city of Indianapolis to raise the local tax on car rentals is drawing the ire of the industry, which argues the increase will affect the local population as much as visitors.

Mayor Greg Ballard and City-County Council President Maggie Lewis on Monday announced an agreement on the city's $1.1 billion budget that calls for raising local car-rental taxes and the city’s admission tax to avoid a potential reduction in services. The proposal still must be approved by the council.

The local tax on car rentals would increase to 6 percent from 4 percent. Combined with 4-percent state rental tax and the 7-percent state sales tax, Marion County car-rental customers would pay a combined 17-percent tax after the increase.

Without the raise, the 15-percent car rental tax rate already accounts for Indianapolis’ being ranked No. 8 on the Global Business Travel Association's list of the worst 10 cities for travel taxes in 2012. The group also considered Indianapolis' 9-percent tax on food and beverages and its 17-percent tax on hotels when making the ranking.

Visit Indy, the city's tourism agency, typically favors proposals that support the Capital Improvement Board of Marion County, spokesman Chris Gahl said. The CIB, which collects the car-rental tax, funds half of the agency’s operating budget.

The CIB oversees Lucas Oil Stadium, Bankers Life Fieldhouse and the Indiana Convention Center. It collected $2 million in car-rental taxes in 2011. Last year’s collection figures are not yet available.

“We are positioned and seen in the visitor’s mind as a high-value destination, even taking into consideration the hotel tax and the projected [higher] car rental tax,” Gahl said.
 
A study released last month by Visit Indy estimated the economic impact of the tourism industry increased 10 percent in 2011, to $3.95 billion. An estimated 22 million visitors came to the city, most of them for leisure activities.

Gahl said Visit Indy plans to convene its executive committee to study the proposal to raise the car-rental tax.

The car-rental industry opposes a tax increase, arguing that it affects local residents as well as out-of-towners.

“It’s flat out discriminatory and unfair,” said Laura Bryant, a spokeswoman for St. Louis-based Enterprise Holdings Inc., which operates the Enterprise-Rent-A-Car, Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental chains.

The three combined have 24 locations in Marion County that would be affected by the tax increase.

Enterprise Holdings and its competitors have argued in recent years, as more cities turn to rental-car taxes to raise revenue, that the taxes may cause more harm than good.

Though local politicians routinely market the levies as so-called travel or hospitality taxes on visitors, more than half of car rentals are actually local, industry figures show.

Indianapolis-based Ace Rent A Car, for instance, rents cars every week to motorists whose vehicles are being serviced or repaired following an accident, said Charlie Mullen, co-owner of the local chain.

“We do a lot of replacement rentals,” he said, "so everybody pays.”

Nationwide, more than 100 car-rental excise taxes have been enacted across 43 states and the District of Columbia in recent years, raising more than $7.5 billion, according to the industry.

The American Car Rental Association last year supported federal legislation that would prohibit future “discriminatory taxes” imposed upon car rental customers by state and local governments. The proposal failed to advance out of a House committee.

Meanwhile, the tax on tickets to attend Indianapolis Colts and Indiana Pacers games would rise to 10 percent.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • singapore tour
    I want to make sure that it is very important to see whether or not his is something that is going to improve in many way.
  • Oh, I get it...
    ...it's Orwellian because the CIB only improves the capital of Jim Irsay and Mel Simon rather than the capital of the public, whom it is said to represent.
  • Orwellian CIB
    The real issue is the existence of the CIB and the phony tourism industry - an industry supported totally by tax dollars, with profits going to billionaire sports team owners and hotel chain owners, with a few wage slaves sweeping up the crumbs.
  • Council
    First, while Ballard earns most of the blame for this proposal (has the man ever met a tax or fee he didn't want to increase?), Republicans and some Democratic councilors are also supporting it. Second, it is clear that neither the Mayor or Council members care one bit that these taxes hit locals far more than "visitors." Their goal is to put more money in the pockets of the CIB so the CIB has the money to give millions out to the Pacers and Colts. The CIB is the absolute worst gov't (or quasi gov't) entity in the city/county. The CIB leadership appointed by Ballard, Bob Grand and Ann Lathrop, have proven to be completely disinterested in doing what is best for the public.
  • Car rental rates
    The city of Indianapolis seems to want to get out of town visitors to return to all events in this city. Why would they raise the rates on car rentals. This would tend to keep tourists trade down.
  • Ridiculous!
    I recently rented a car from the airport ( I live in Indy) and it was almost double the estimated cost due to all the taxes surcharges and fees. I've never seen so many different taxes for one thing. I will definitely be limiting my use of car rentals. I am willing to contribute to reasonable taxes and participate in making Indy a nice place to live, but this is out of line. Lets focus on reducing spending and especially irresponsible spending!
  • So Republicans want to raise taxes
    Perfect example of how this hurts everyone: My car has to go in to the shop for repairs and an insurance company is providing me a rental. This car is being rented from a car rental company in Indianapolis. Now, when taxes are raised on rental car companies, the cost of the rental to the insurance company will increase, therefore premiums will increase to cover the new fees, therefore I will pay those increased premiums. So thanks for raising taxes, republicans. Isn't that supposed to be one of the reasons to vote republican? I guess when you're preoccupied with forcing children to learn a communication style as outdated as the telegraph (cursive) and adding amendments to the constitution for which we already have a law on the books to prevent (gay marriage), you lose the focus on your party's core values.
  • sorry
    When you are in the travel industry, tough sow said the cow.
  • Unintended Consequences
    This is what happens with such narrow-focus tax policy. Indiana and all the locals need to seriously rethink their approach to revenue...and stop wasting money. Broadest possible consumption tax, on everything, even used goods, durable goods, food, meds, literally everything, makes much more sense, and would be a vastly lower rate. It's far past time to repeal all these nit-pick taxes and replace the whole lot with broader application of the sales tax and stop this madness.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT