IBJNews

Carmel buying 12 acres for new well field

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Carmel has agreed to buy about 12 acres adjacent to the Mansion at Oak Hill along 116th Street near Hazel Dell Parkway for a new well field.

The popular conference and catering facility agreed to sell the land, part of what’s known as Northern Beach, so that Carmel’s water utility can keep pace with a growing population. The city paid about $430,000.

The utility plans to spend $25 million to build a new water treatment plant at 106th Street and Gray Road that will handle the water. The facility will be the city’s fourth water-treatment plant.

The Northern Beach property is labeled as groundwater-rich on old Department of Natural Resources well logs, and recent tests show it could yield up to 8 million gallons per day—about half the projected eventual water demand for Carmel.

Once Carmel is built out, the city’s water utility expects to serve about 45,000 customers using an average of about 16 million gallons per day. Currently, the utility delivers about eight million gallons per day, all of it from wells. It also is taking over service for about 8,000 former Indianapolis Water Co. customers.

“We have to find additional groundwater for future growth,” said John Duffy, the city’s director of utilities. “Hopefully, within a year or so we’ll be live with at least one new well (at Northern Beach).”

Carmel’s existing wells, most of which are just west of the White River, are far from dry, but rapid growth demands more sources of water, said Mayor Jim Brainard. He noted that water rates in Carmel are just one-third those charged by IWC.

The new wells should not affect business at Oak Hill, a 1940s mansion that was moved in 1990 from a farm west of River Road to its current home southeast of 116th Street and Hazel Dell Parkway. The 15,000-square-foot, southern colonial mansion now hosts a variety of events, from concerts to weddings.

A portion of the land Carmel is buying is part of a floodplain so development for any other purpose would have been difficult, if not impossible, Duffy said.

“The owner was happy and we’re certainly happy,” he said.

Stan Elser of Grubb & Ellis Harding Dahm & Co. represented the seller, Mansion Real Estate LLC. Carmel represented itself.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Contact for comment/info
    Contact the Greenways Foundation for comment/info:
    Mailing address: P.O. Box 80091, Indianapolis, Indiana 46280-0091
    Phone: (317) 848-7855
    www.indygreenways.org
  • i agree..
    I agree with Mark. The White River is a wonderful asset to Indiana and Carmel; greater access to Trail Run Park would be enjoyable for many outdoor enthusiaist.
  • Bike Paths
    Can the city utilize it to make the mountain bike path that has been rumored. This would be perfect to continue from 146th down to 96th and connect to town run trail park!!! Please Carmel.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT