IBJNews

Carmel council axes funding for redevelopment commission boss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel City Council members exerted their influence over redevelopment commission expenses Monday night, denying a $60,000 contract extension for longtime Executive Director Les Olds despite Mayor Jim Brainard’s pleas to keep him on the job.

“I need him there doing the things he does very, very well,” Brainard said of Olds, an architect who has led the Carmel Redevelopment Commission as it essentially rebuilt the suburban city’s downtown.

Rejecting the contract extension “effectively shuts down the CRC,” he said after the resolution failed by a 3-4 vote.

Council President Rick Sharp, who sided with the majority, disagrees.

“I don’t think the situation is really as dire as it’s being portrayed,” he told IBJ.

The CRC paid Olds $116,000 in 2012, Councilor Luci Snyder said, but his compensation was cut along with the agency’s budget when the city agreed to refinance $184 million in redevelopment-related debt late last year. As part of the deal, council members passed a pair of ordinances giving them control of future debt and certain expenses, including large professional services contracts.

Redevelopment operations were transferred to a city department, and Olds in January signed a consulting contract that called for him to be paid $60,000 in 2013, plus a $120-per-month cell phone allowance. No hourly rate was specified, but Olds' invoices listed a $100-per-hour rate.

Attached to that contract was a 10-item list of services Olds was to perform—tasks such as overseeing development of Carmel City Center, coordinating master planning of the city’s blighted and underused sites, and working with assorted architectural and engineering consultants. LS/Olds Consulting LLC was not to do anything to run up the bill without written consent from the city.

At $100 an hour, costs accumulated quickly. Olds’ January invoice amounted to nearly $10,000, for example.

So in June,  with the $60,000 spent, members of the CRC quietly (and unanimously) approved another $60,000 deal to pay Olds for the rest of the year, asking councilors to OK the expenditure along with three other professional service contracts. The council must approve agreements that exceed $25,000.

Snyder, who chairs the council Finance Committee, balked at the $495,000 total request—presented without any supporting documents—and asked to review the actual contracts. Only financial consultant Umbaugh & Associates provided the requested information in time for the committee’s July 24 meeting.

Monday night, the council considered each contract separately. Members approved a $95,000 deal for Umbaugh with no discussion or dissent, then OK’d $40,000 for engineering firm American Structurepoint before having a lively discussion about a $300,000 contract with legal adviser Wallack Somers & Haas. Council members ultimately voted to allow the expense, which was included in the CRC’s 2013 budget.

But Snyder flagged the Olds contract as questionable, given the drastic reduction in redevelopment activities in the wake of the CRC debt restructuring. Why, she asked, should the executive director be paid more to do less?

She also criticized Olds’ job performance, saying the organization got into financial trouble under his watch. And the CRC failed to maintain proper records, Snyder said, citing project agreements with pages omitted, sales contracts without required signatures and an array of missing original documents.

“This was a mess,” she said, addressing Olds. “I don’t think you’ve done your job … and I will not vote for your contract.”

Council members Carol Schleif and Eric Seidensticker joined Snyder and Sharp in denying the request.

Olds, who declined to comment after the vote, acknowledged to the council that the CRC’s recordkeeping was “not perfect” in the past, but he said it’s improving.

“We’re going to get better,” he said. “We’re going to get smarter.”

Brainard said what Olds lacks in recordkeeping skills he more than makes up for in other areas such as architectural expertise. Olds’ years of experience—in the industry and in Carmel—have saved the city money on redevelopment projects, the mayor said.

“He has paid for his salary many times over because he knows how to do these things,” Brainard said.

Responding to a question from councilor Kevin “Woody” Rider, commission member David Bowers said Olds is a “vital part” of CRC’s ongoing operations.

The commission is working on redeveloping the former Party Time Rental site on Range Line Road, for example, and needs to find a new user for the City Center building that formerly housed Shapiro’s Deli.

Rider and council colleagues Ron Carter and Sue Finkam voted in favor of the contract extension, citing concerns about the consequences of leaving the redevelopment commission leaderless.

“I don’t want to see the commission go without an executive director,” Finkam said, suggesting the council OK the new contract and establish performance standards for Olds.

At times contentious, the debate continued even after the vote.

Sharp doesn’t weigh in during council deliberations, given his role as president, but he makes it a policy to explain controversial decisions afterward. He said he has “great respect” for Olds, but resents the CRC’s apparent disregard for the council’s expense-approval process.

“To just be handed it as a fait accompli—‘Oops, we spent it all and now we need another $60,000,’—that’s the kind of stuff that got us in trouble in the first place,” he said.

Brainard, who is an attorney, questioned the legality of the council-approval requirement, saying state lawmakers have given redevelopment commissions the right to use revenue as they see fit. He said he signed the ordinance to get the CRC refinancing done, but had reservations then.

“This is a direct grab of power from the state Legislature,” Brainard said.

Monday’s vote will kill the CRC, the mayor predicted—something he said council leaders promised wouldn’t happen.

“Is that really the council’s will?” he asked. “Just to stop redeveloping the Arts & Design District and City Center?”

Sharp said he doubts Monday's decision will have such drastic results.

“These things are rarely settled with one vote,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hey Joe
    Everyone is welcome in Carmel, but name callers can stay home. It costs no money to hang out at Main & the Monon.
  • Others
    In the past three weeks I've been to several small cities in the USA that are much nicer than Carmel. To call Carmel a world class city is delusional and is buying into the Mayor's PR. Their debt is certainly world-class, something around a total approaching $1,000,000,000.00 for a city of 80,000.
  • The Good Mayor
    Say what you will, Mayor Brainard has turned Carmel into a world class city. Downtown Carmel is simply amazing and the roundabouts are ingenious. When Meridian Street goes under construction, Carmel would be a grid lock if Keystone didn't happen first. The arts district is fantastic. Lower crime and property taxes than Indy, it's difficult to say anything negative about Carmel. And no, I don't live there or give money to it.
  • Way to go Carmel City Council!
    Mayor Brainard's response is absolutely hilarious because it is so pathetic. A power grab from the State Legislature?!?! Mayor Brainard has been the biggest Power Grabber on the face of the earth!!! He has done an end-around to spend money on projects that he does not have the authority to spend. It's about time that Mayor Brainard and his yes men get their comeuppance.
  • What?
    A living Norman Rockwell picture? That's about right. The way the finances in Carmel have been messed up and all of the debt that has been accumulated for all of the shiny new stuff, it is a fantasy land. BTW, the Norman Rockwell thing is a typical comment that has been made many times by one of the Mayor's biggest political supporters. I find it interesting that Carmel is striving for a "Norman Rockwell existence." These days that's really a misguided view, a view of a past non-realistic romantic existence, not the present nor the future.
  • In reply to Mike
    Agree with virtually everything you said Mike, I think development in City Center area needs to be done. Problem is, the CRC and the council got in bed with developers outside that area, and there are projects not finished. They have run out of money on the Illinois project, and can't finish it. Now that may not affect folks in the other areas of Carmel, but it is shortly going to change our lives west of Meridian. The developments forced upon us along Springmill, are going to substitute Springmill for 31. Its not going to be pretty. And, talk about a waste of money, what about them already rebuilding the roundabout at Springmill and 116th! I guess to the council, rebuilding few year old roundabouts is fiscally responsible.
  • It's called "accountability."
    The argument that "some things he does well and other things he does not" is asinine to try and convince you to pay him another $60,000. How about you pay someone who can do the job right? You did not shut down all the projects in the city, Les Olds shot himself in the foot for half-assing what he was paid to do. It's called accountability, Brainard. Look it up. Obviously you still don't have a grasp on the concept.
  • Keep Carmel Moving Forward
    Just hang out near Main & the Monon on weekends or in the evening and you will witness a living Norman Rockwell picture (i.e people of all ages, shapes and sizes, strollers, training wheels and wheelchairs, dogs and bikes of every description, bands & the occasional street performer, etc). The family atmosphere makes me proud to call Carmel home. My hat goes off to all who made that possible including the the mayor, City Council and CRC, and I look forward to the planned development south of that intersection. This is why people move here and choose to stay here. Politics aside, I suggest we move forward with development and sooner is better.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

    2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

    3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

    4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

    5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

    ADVERTISEMENT