Report: Carmel panel may face TIF shortfall but can pay debts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New financial projections suggest the Carmel Redevelopment Commission will have enough annual revenue to pay its debts for the next 15 years before dipping into reserves.

But property taxes from the city’s two-dozen TIF districts could fall more than $1 million short as soon as next year—something City Council member Rick Sharp says is cause for alarm.

Municipal-finance adviser H.J. Umbaugh & Associates estimates the CRC will collect about $18 million in so-called tax increment in 2015, applying all of it to debt payments that total $19.1 million. The difference—plus about $630,000 that’s being called a “surplus”—is expected to come from other, much smaller income streams.

According to the analysis, prepared at the commission’s request, total revenue should exceed debt obligations by at least six figures every year until 2029, when the redevelopment areas begin to expire and tax revenue drops by $10 million a year.

By then, the CRC should have more than $27 million in a “special reserve” fund the Carmel City Council mandated in 2012, when it refinanced $184 million in redevelopment debt. More than $1.9 million a year is expected to flow into the account from an existing TIF district that is about to retire its debt.

CRC President Bill Hammer said the report shows the commission is capable of meeting its obligations, avoiding a citywide special-benefits tax that would kick in if it missed a payment. The extra property tax was offered as a belts-and-suspenders fallback to get a better bond rating in 2012, he said.

“We never really intended to use that as the first source of payment,” he said. “And we think that given the projections of today, it will never happen.”

He praised the City Council’s “great foresight” in establishing the reserve fund to cover any future shortfalls, adding that the agency has adjusted its spending plan to conserve cash and found additional savings by refinancing more bonds this year.

Sharp appreciates the kudos, but the former council president is concerned about tax proceeds failing to keep pace with debt—to the tune of an estimated $43 million by 2037. The more other revenue goes to bond payments, he said, the less the CRC has to do its redevelopment work.

“Are we folding up shop? Are we done?” Sharp asked. “If that’s the case, I can accept looking at the debt versus total revenue. Otherwise, the only prudent thing to do is look at TIF revenue.”

And the message there?

“It was a mistake to go right up to the edge of the cliff,” he told IBJ.

During the meeting, Hammer called the revenue estimates conservative, saying officials are confident the targeted areas "will continue to attract a great deal of private development."


  • Projections Lacking
    Umbaugh projections didn't show operating expenses of the Carmel Redevelopment Commission, and how they will be funded. Their assumption on future projects are questionable, however they assume revenue from them will be there. There is definitely a shortfall in TIF revenue. Umbaugh loaded the assumption in order to show that enough money will be available to paid the bonds. Umbaugh previously predicted that there was ample future revenue, however two bailouts of the Commission were needed over the last two years. The Commission is operating on a shoestring and a Special Benefits Tax still looms over Carmel taxpayers.
  • pass around the plate to all the rich
    I suggest that a fund raiser for the city, from all wealthy individuals to pay off the 184 million dollars.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.