IBJNews

Cash-strapped schools eye full-day kindergarten

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Parents who want their children in full-day kindergarten could find it harder to find or more expensive as schools comply with a state order to slash millions from their budgets.

But many school systems in Indiana are trying to find ways to maintain the programs, or even start them, because of the benefit they bring to young learners.

"This is a tremendous opportunity with full-day kindergarten to build up skills students may not be able to receive if parents are unable to afford paying for preschool programs," said Merrillville Superintendent Tony Lux.

The state provides funding for half-day kindergarten programs and gives an additional amount for students in full-day programs. Those dollars are divided among all full-day kindergarten students across the state and aren't enough to support the full-day programs in most cases.

Many districts want to keep the programs and say they're considering increasing fees to do so. Merrillville charges $2,000 a year for full-day kindergarten, and Lux said that might rise next year; Center Grove in Johnson County is also considering increasing fees, and Eastern Hancock plans to charge families a $1,000 fee for its program for the first time.

Other districts are getting creative: Hobart will consolidate kindergarten classes into one school to make full-day kindergarten available at no cost. Instead, they'll fund the five-hour school day through grants.

Other districts, including Edinburgh, are considering eliminating the programs.

The challenges for school districts reflect a financial climate that has forced the state to shift away from what was a cornerstone of Gov. Mitch Daniels' education agenda when he first took office. State revenue has fallen millions short of even the most conservative projections, and school districts are looking for savings in every corner.

School officials say it's not unusual for interest in full-day kindergarten to change as a state's fortunes rise or fall. Emmett Lippe, interim superintendent for Center Grove schools, said he saw such a pattern repeat itself in Michigan while he worked there as an educator.

But proponents say the benefits outweigh the costs.

"It gives them a tremendous head start," Lippe said.

Those advantages are driving districts like Franklin and Nineveh-Hensley-Jackson as they consider expanding their full-programs despite budget cuts.

Nineveh-Hensley-Jackson, which now offers full-day kindergarten only to students from low-income families, is considering opening the program to all children. Parents who enroll their children would pay a fee to offset the cost.

The district currently has two full-day kindergarten classrooms with a total of about 30 students. Expanding could require adding teachers.

Superintendent Mark Millis said parents wanted the program, which would help improve children's reading skills at an early age.

Franklin also is gauging parents' interest before offering a full-day program available to all students.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett acknowledged the financial realities schools are facing. But he still hopes full-day kindergarten becomes a reality statewide someday.

"In this economy, obviously ... that's not a possibility," Bennett said. "As we see the economy rebound and see opportunities for funding avail itself, obviously that's something that will help all students in Indiana."


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

    I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

    Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

  2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

  3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

  4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

  5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

ADVERTISEMENT