IBJNews

Cash-strapped schools eye full-day kindergarten

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Parents who want their children in full-day kindergarten could find it harder to find or more expensive as schools comply with a state order to slash millions from their budgets.

But many school systems in Indiana are trying to find ways to maintain the programs, or even start them, because of the benefit they bring to young learners.

"This is a tremendous opportunity with full-day kindergarten to build up skills students may not be able to receive if parents are unable to afford paying for preschool programs," said Merrillville Superintendent Tony Lux.

The state provides funding for half-day kindergarten programs and gives an additional amount for students in full-day programs. Those dollars are divided among all full-day kindergarten students across the state and aren't enough to support the full-day programs in most cases.

Many districts want to keep the programs and say they're considering increasing fees to do so. Merrillville charges $2,000 a year for full-day kindergarten, and Lux said that might rise next year; Center Grove in Johnson County is also considering increasing fees, and Eastern Hancock plans to charge families a $1,000 fee for its program for the first time.

Other districts are getting creative: Hobart will consolidate kindergarten classes into one school to make full-day kindergarten available at no cost. Instead, they'll fund the five-hour school day through grants.

Other districts, including Edinburgh, are considering eliminating the programs.

The challenges for school districts reflect a financial climate that has forced the state to shift away from what was a cornerstone of Gov. Mitch Daniels' education agenda when he first took office. State revenue has fallen millions short of even the most conservative projections, and school districts are looking for savings in every corner.

School officials say it's not unusual for interest in full-day kindergarten to change as a state's fortunes rise or fall. Emmett Lippe, interim superintendent for Center Grove schools, said he saw such a pattern repeat itself in Michigan while he worked there as an educator.

But proponents say the benefits outweigh the costs.

"It gives them a tremendous head start," Lippe said.

Those advantages are driving districts like Franklin and Nineveh-Hensley-Jackson as they consider expanding their full-programs despite budget cuts.

Nineveh-Hensley-Jackson, which now offers full-day kindergarten only to students from low-income families, is considering opening the program to all children. Parents who enroll their children would pay a fee to offset the cost.

The district currently has two full-day kindergarten classrooms with a total of about 30 students. Expanding could require adding teachers.

Superintendent Mark Millis said parents wanted the program, which would help improve children's reading skills at an early age.

Franklin also is gauging parents' interest before offering a full-day program available to all students.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett acknowledged the financial realities schools are facing. But he still hopes full-day kindergarten becomes a reality statewide someday.

"In this economy, obviously ... that's not a possibility," Bennett said. "As we see the economy rebound and see opportunities for funding avail itself, obviously that's something that will help all students in Indiana."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT