IBJNews

Celadon snaps up two more trucking companies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Celadon Group Inc.'s litany of acquisitions rolls on, with two more deals announced Friday that will expand its footprint and add temperature-controlled service to its specialties.

The Indianapolis-based company's Celadon Trucking Services subsidiary has agreed to acquire Warren-based Rock Leasing Inc. in northeast Indiana and Wadley, Ala.-based Kelly Logistics Inc.

Terms of the purchases were not disclosed.

Rock Leasing is a leading provider of temperature-controlled shipments in the Midwest. Celadon plan to maintain Rock’s Indiana leasing facility — a 20-acre site in Huntington County that includes 150,000 square feet of warehouse space.

Kelly Logistics offers dedicated customer spotting and shuttle services in the Southeast.

“Based on previous acquisitions, we believe we can actually enhance that service through upgraded equipment, advanced technology, additional assets available for dispatch, and an industry leading safety record,” Celadon CEO Paul Will said in a prepared statement.

Celadon has made more than a dozen acquisitions in as many years—typically small, privately held carriers. Many have been under pressure during the economic slowdown. Often, their value is found in their equipment and assets.

In 2011 alone, Celadon bought the dry van division assets of Dallas-based FFE Transportation and acquired Pennsylvania-based Martini Transportation.

That year, Celadon also bought 6.3 percent of Arkansas-based USA Truck. Celadon expressed interest in a deeper “association,” but USA management slammed the door.

Celadon is one of the nation’s largest truckload carriers, with customers including Chrysler, General Electric, Phillip Morris and Walmart.  In its most recent fiscal year, Celadon earned $15.2 million on revenue of $568.3 million.

Earlier this week, parent Celadon Group Inc. said it plans to build a $5.25 million driver-training center and add 182 workers to its 633-employee local work force by 2016, according to documents filed with the city.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT