Central Indiana district plans to keep school-bus fee

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Leaders of a suburban Indianapolis school district say they don't intend to restore free school-bus service unless courts order them to do so.

The Franklin Township district faces a parent lawsuit over its decision this year to turn its buses over to an outside agency that is charging at least $40 a month per child for bus service.

School district attorney Chuck Rubright said some other districts around the state are considering similar budget-cutting actions and that a court determination on whether the fees are legal is needed.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said last week that it's unconstitutional for school districts to end free school bus service by turning transportation over to outside agencies.

Zoeller also said in the non-binding legal opinion that he will ask the official state auditor, the State Board of Accounts, to review a Franklin Township's transportation arrangement.

"Under Indiana's Constitution and statutes, a public school corporation cannot charge fees for students to ride a bus to school to receive the public education to which they are entitled. The school cannot charge bus fees directly, and they cannot charge bus fees indirectly by outsourcing the driving to a third party," Zoeller said.

Zoeller said he researched the issue at the request of state Sen. Patricia Miller and Rep. Mike Speedy, both R-Indianapolis, who requested analysis and guidance for possible legislation to address the situation.

Zoeller's opinion said Indiana law would allow parents independently to contract jointly with bus drivers to provide transportation if the school district did not, but said that was not the case in the southeast side district. He the school board contracted first with the cooperative and then imposed the arrangement on parents, and that was unlawful.

Zoeller said if a State Board of Accounts audit finds that the school district has appropriated or used funds without legal authorization, his office could try to recover the money from the responsible parties.

"It is easy to understand how financial constraints might lead school corporations to difficult funding choices, which in turn have unintended consequences. Many parents who cannot or will not pay the unconstitutional school bus fee are now forced to drive their children to and from school," Zoeller said. "However, the option chosen by Franklin Township Schools cannot be justified and should be discontinued."

Zoeller issued a similar non-binding opinion last year that districts couldn't directly charge bus fees.



  • Must be foggy in your world
    You have to be a tool. By eliminating a service they did parents a favor? Are you the superintendent or simply a secretary following orders? Try harder, Weatherman.
  • Schoolyard bullies
    Franklin Township's treatment of parents is much like that of a playground bully and make no mistake about it...this move was designed to intimidate parents into passing future bond issues. It is transparent. It is outrageous. I'd love to see how much money this district has wasted on technology that was obsolete or never implemented. It's common knowledge among tech people that schools are the easiest marks. They will buy anything and they are clueless about value. I'd love to see how much money these folks have squandered on consultants. I know the waste is there and it wouldn't be hard to find at all. Perhaps state law should require independent audits of school districts that behave in such a manner. Perhaps we should get at the truth. Perhaps the bullies should be compelled to comply with their own anti-bullying policies. They are nothing but common punks.
  • Push on parents...
    My forecast for the day: Push on with your lawsuits Franklin Twp parents, and you'll all be driving your children to work next year. No where in the state constitution do I see a clause *requiring* school districts to provide transportation. What they did by setting up the arrangements, was do you all a favor, and in the process probably lowering the monthly rate vs independent contracting between parents and bus companies.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

    2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

    3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

    4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

    5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............