CEO convinces investors that ITT is on the rebound

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For a guy who leads a company with stock that has lost 75 percent of its value in the past year, Kevin Modany, the CEO of ITT Educational Services Inc., sounds pretty upbeat.

And it seemed to rub off on investors Thursday.

After the Carmel-based operator of for-profit companies issued a disastrous fourth-quarter earnings report Thursday morning, the company’s stock price fell more than 18 percent—at one point reaching a low not seen since 2001.

But, at 11 a.m., Modany began charming Wall Street analysts and investors with a highly detailed presentation that gave this message: It’s morning at ITT.

By the time Modany finished speaking at 11:58, ITT Educational’s stock was back in positive territory for the day. And it stayed there, climbing 18 percent by the close of trading, to $16.85 per share.

Modany revealed that ITT Educational students are defaulting on a block of $400 million in private student loans at a stunning rate of 60 percent. That’s twice as much as historical norms and even 20 percent worse than ITT Educational’s assumed worst-case scenario.

ITT Educational guaranteed repayment of those loans, so it was forced to set aside $66.1 million in the fourth quarter to cover future losses on that portfolio.

“We’re not pleased with this. These default rates are much higher than we’ve ever seen,” Modany told investors. But, he added, “The focus here is to try to get a fence around that thing and see if we can put it behind us.”

Modany painted the $66 million charge as a high-end estimate of ITT Educational’s loan exposure. He said the company is lobbying the private lenders on the loans to modify the terms of repayment, so students can make smaller payments, or have longer terms or possibly even have debt amounts reduced.

If any of those efforts pay off, Modany said, ITT Educational’s charges could come in lower.

"Thank you for providing all the color," Kelly Flynn, an analyst at Credit Suisse, said during the ITT conference call. Other analysts echoed her sentiment.

Modany and his chief financial officer, Dan Fitzpatrick, also waved away some analysts’s concerns about ITT running short of cash. It has seven to 10 years to pay off its loan obligations.

Meanwhile, Modany gave a preliminary but positive report on ITT Educational’s new scholarship program, which ITT piloted late last year at 24 of its 175 campuses.

The scholarships effectively reduce the average cost of an ITT associate’s degree from $47,000 to $27,500.

Those 24 campuses saw new student enrollment declines of just 6.3 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with declines of 12.7 percent at all other ITT campuses. The scholarship program also yielded a higher percentage of potential students who inquire about ITT actually enrolling, Modany said.

“The preliminary results thus far are positive and heading in the right direction,” Modany told investors.

Beginning this month, ITT Educational expanded the “opportunity scholarship” program to 101 more campuses. And it will expand it to all its schools by the end of the year, essentially replacing all private loan programs.

ITT Educational students will, of course, still use federal loans to pay ITT’s pricey tuition. Such loans account for more than 75 percent of ITT Educational’s annual revenue of $1.3 billion.

In an interview Thursday afternoon, Modany said he and his management team stuck with the private loan programs as long as they did because not until the middle of 2012 did their internal data show prospective students becoming more sensitive to the net cost of an ITT degree.

“Prospective students, five years ago, 10 years ago, it wasn’t about, ‘What was the cost?’ It was about out-of-pocket: ‘Do I make a payment now or later?’ “What’s my monthly payment?’” Modany said.

But, Modany added, “When you’re five years into this kind of a downturn, you’re more sensitive to any kind of investment.”

He also cited pressure from the Obama administration’s focus on whether graduates of for-profit colleges were landing “gainful employment” that allowed them to repay their student loans, as well as publicity shined on the debt loads of for-profit students by news media and Senate hearings.

“So we had to change. We had to change how we present our programs of study, and that’s why the scholarship came into play,” Modany said.

Modany acknowledges that the scholarship program—along with ITT Educational’s other challenges—will put pressure on its profits.

The company predicted its revenue per student will drop this year by 4 percent to 6 percent. It also predicted total profits ranging from $3.50 per share to $4 per share—a huge drop from its earnings per share in 2012 of $5.85 per share. Before Thursday, analysts were expecting earnings of $4.53 cents per share this year.

But Modany also thinks the lower effective prices—dropped into an environment in which students are more price sensitive—could boost enrollment by as much as 5 percent this year. And if that happens, ITT Educational could end up doing even better than before. At least he hopes.

“So if we’re able to generate some enrollment growth, we’re seeing the vast, vast, vast majority of those incremental revenues fall to the bottom line,” Modany told investors.

Translation: We can only go up from here.


  • For Profit Education Is Wrong
    I saw a job opening at ITT and, as always, checked the place out on Glassdoor. Whoa. What a despicable enterprise. I agree entirely with the points made in the previous comment. There is also something to be learned from the employee comments (almost all of them scathing), which remark again and again on the goodness of the teachers and other people who work on the campuses and on the badness of the management. Most people understand that, like medicine and our food supply and the prison system, education should not be a business. Unfortunately, the few who don't get this are the ones with all the money and power. I'll clean toilets for a living before I'll apply to ITT.
  • Game over
    ITT's glory days are gone! Kudos to the Obama administration for putting the clamps on these "for profit" gold digging companies who have used students and the Federal government for a long time for their own gains! They have cost the tax payers billions! Imagine getting away with paying back only 26% of what you owed a creditor for guaranteed loans! This is what ITT has done and they still owe Sallie Mae hundreds of millions of dollars! I can't believe they are allowed to get away with this!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.