IBJNews

ITT suffers tough quarter on enrollment drop, loan losses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ITT Educational Services Inc. swung to a loss in the fourth quarter as it recorded $71 million in charges related to private loans that students are struggling to repay. The poor quarterly results sent shares tumbling early Thursday morning, but they rebounded strongly later in the day.

The Carmel-based operator of for-profit colleges lost $9.5 million in the three months ended Dec. 31, or 41 cents per share. In the same quarter a year ago, ITT Educational earned $76 million, or $2.89 per share.

Revenue in the quarter plunged 18 percent from a year ago, to $300.8 million. That total badly missed the projections of Wall Street analysts, who predicted ITT would post revenue of $313.6 million, according to a survey conducted by Thomson Reuters.

Shares of ITT Educational plummeted early in the day, then shot back up into positive territory.

Shares fell as low as $11.69 each in the morning, their lowest intraday price since Jan. 26, 2001. They closed at $16.85, up 17.7 percent.

The shares closed Wednesday at $14.32 apiece, down 78 percent over the past 12 months.

The revenue declines were driven by falling enrollment. Enrollment has been hammered across the entire for-profit college industry over the past two years after the Obama administration and Senate Democrats scrutinized the industry and whether its high tuition costs pay off with good jobs for students.

ITT Educational's new student enrollment fell 11.4 percent in the most recent quarter to 13,398.

ITT has helped students afford its high prices—about $47,000 for a two-year associate's degree—by partnering with private lenders to give students even more loans on top of the federal loans they also use to enroll. ITT guaranteed repayment on thsoe private loans, and now that commitment is coming back to bite the company.

Earlier this month, ITT agreed to pay $46 million to Virginia-based student lender SLM Corp. to settle a legal dispute over the losses in a $180 million loan portfolio. ITT recorded $21.8 million of those charges in the fourth quarter.

But the bigger charges were for other private loan programs ITT set up in 2009 and 2010, which total about $441 million. The company said it set aside reserves for those programs of $66.1 million, on top of $20.1 million the comapny already had reserved to cover losses in the loan programs.

The charges confirmed the fears of analysts, several of whom downgraded the company's stock in the wake of its settlement with SLM.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • student loans
    Student debt is stunting the growth of the economy. Student loans have increased by 500% over past decade. As the next generation graduates from college, they are plagued by insurmountable debt that places demands on their income, limiting their ability to spend their earnings in ways that stimulate the economy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRA9ndc1pCM
  • ITT is the new IWHO
    When the words "for profit" and "college" are strung together in the same sentence, somebody is about to get fleeced.
  • ITT Qualifcations
    We have interviewed a couple dozen ITT "grads" over the years and found them to come up way short on being ready to employ. I an shocked to hear that it costs so much to go there for two years. The CA Comm College system is a much better model for advanced two year education at a fraction of this ITT cost.
  • Accountable
    The educational experience was always secondary to ITT making lots of money. Maybe this will help ITT focus more on the students actually graduating and finding gainful employment. Keep in mind ITT is one of the biggest players in "private" education. Think of all the smaller players, including beauty schools, that have used student loans to make a bunch of money in the past. These days may well be over, or at least drastically changed. Cracking down on these "for profit" schools is good for taxpayers.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT