IBJNews

Children's Museum holds key to Winona redevelopment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis doesn’t intend to pay for the abandoned Winona Hospital site, but it is playing the role of lead developer.

With the city of Indianapolis about to spend $2.7 million in federal grant money on demolition and environmental cleanup, developers are showing interest in the property at 32nd and Meridian streets. The museum and city are working together to come up with a mixed-use plan that would include housing, some sort of commerce and an outdoor component involving the nearby museum.

“We’ve been very heartened by the city’s openness to the idea of a mixed-use plan,” CEO Jeff Patchen said.

The former hospital site is just north of the museum and has been vacant since 2004. The museum controls 19 acres in the neighborhood, including two parcels adjacent to Winona.

The museum’s interest in the property is no secret. At one time, it envisioned using the whole hospital site for an outdoor extension of its kid-friendly science and cultural experience, but the recession downsized those plans. The museum's endowment shrank by $100 million during the downturn, but it has since rebounded to about $270 million.

“These times call for a different response,” Patchen said.

The city took control of the hospital site last year and has written off about $1 million in tax bills. It requested proposals for redevelopment last February, but no one responded. That opened the door to a no-bid development process.

The Children’s Museum stepped forward more than a year ago, Deputy Mayor Michael Huber said. The city encouraged museum officials to talk to “community stakeholders,” he said, and ultimately agreed to work with the museum in a “leading role as developer.”

At that time, he said, the city was unsure how to pay for the environmental cleanup.

Now, the city and museum are fielding calls from interested developers. Maury Plambeck, the city's director of metropolitan development, said he’s telling developers to talk to the museum, which is also leading the effort to formulate a “quality of life” plan covering six neighborhoods.

Huber said the city and museum have not yet outlined a redevelopment proposal, and the city does not have a formal agreement with the museum.

“We are working with them as a partner,” Huber said. “As long as the property is still owned by the city, I’d like to think we have a significant amount of leverage on what the project’s like.”

In any case, a major redevelopment of the Winona site is likely to require the museum’s cooperation because it owns two key parcels. One is a grass lot north of 33rd Street, and the other has frontage on Meridian in front of the hospital, Patchen said.

For the museum’s own use, Patchen said he’s interested in parking and a sculpture garden, the size of which is up for discussion.

Although Patchen emphasized that the museum doesn’t have the money to buy or lease the Winona site, he said taking ownership is a possibility. “We’d want to focus on a positive use,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT