China bribery probe leading to tough drug market, CEO says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Marc de Garidel, CEO of French pharmaceutical firm Ipsen SA, said it’s becoming more complicated to do business in China as doctors change habits amid a widening local probe of the drug industry.

Drugmakers under investigation have stopped promoting products in China, and physicians in some hospitals no longer want to meet sales representatives, de Garidel said during a conference call with reporters Friday after his company published first-half earnings.

“In certain cities, in certain areas, there is a toughening of the marketing conditions,” he said. “We are monitoring this very closely. We don’t know how long it will last.”

The comments are the first sign that China’s investigation of bribery allegations against GlaxoSmithKline Plc is hurting business for drug companies.

Indianapolis-based drugmaker Eli Lilly and Co. also is facing allegations that its employees paid Chinese doctors at least $4.9 million in bribes and kickbacks.

A government crackdown against corruption in the $350 billion Chinese health-care market has extended to other foreign companies and local hospitals since the country announced the probe, which involves charges that Glaxo employees used cash and sexual favors to bribe doctors and health officials to promote sales.

Ipsen, the maker of a rival product to Allergan Inc.’s Botox wrinkle smoother, isn’t being investigated in China and hasn’t been visited by local authorities, de Garidel said.

The French company, based in Boulogne-Billancourt, just outside of Paris, has about 700 employees in China, with local headquarters in Beijing and a plant in Tianjin, in the northern part of the country. The drugmaker has been present in China for almost 21 years, Didier Veron, a spokesman for Ipsen, said in an email Friday.

Ipsen’s Chinese sales were affected in July and August, because of changing behavior among doctors, de Garidel said. The executive said it’s difficult to make predictions on how the situation will evolve.

China said last month it would punish 39 hospital employees for taking illegal kickbacks from drugmakers. The hospital staff received inducements totaling $460,000 from two pharmaceutical companies between January 2010 and December 2012, China’s official Xinhua news agency reported July 23, citing the National Health and Family Planning Commission.

Regulators will “severely crack down” on bribery, fake medication and forged documents, China’s Food and Drug Administration said last month. Bribery was one of the main reasons drug prices were falsely inflated in China, Gao Feng, head of the economic crimes investigations unit of the Public Security Ministry, said at a briefing on July 15.

Glaxo faces allegations it traded in sexual favors and had spurious travel and meeting expenses. Lilly, said last week it was investigating allegations its employees paid Chinese doctors in bribes and kickbacks. Paris-based Sanofi faces an investigation over similar allegations.

Simon Steel, a spokesman for Glaxo, didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail and a phone message seeking a comment on whether the U.K. drugmaker has stopped marketing its products in China because of the investigation. Laurence Bollack, a spokeswoman for Sanofi in Paris, said she had no immediate comment when contacted by telephone.

Glaxo said last month it will cooperate with authorities and that it is reviewing all third-party agency relationships and transactions with travel agencies. Sanofi, France’s largest drugmaker, said Aug. 10 it will will cooperate with any review of its business in China.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.