Chrysler's old assets in bankruptcy can be liquidated, court rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chrysler LLC, the 85-year-old carmaker still partially in bankruptcy as Old Carco LLC, won approval to liquidate under a plan that may repay the U.S. almost nothing for its bailout and lets unsecured creditors keep any proceeds from a pending lawsuit against Daimler AG.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Arthur Gonzalez in Manhattan on Tuesday approved Old Carco’s Chapter 11 liquidation, which resolves all remaining objections in the case that began on April 30, 2009. The day it filed, Chrysler agreed that Fiat SpA would pay $2 billion for a stake in the company while Chrysler kept the remnants, including $27 billion of debt, in bankruptcy. A federal appeals court in Manhattan upheld the sale.

“The relevant confirmation standards have been satisfied, therefore the court confirms the plan,” Gonzalez said.

About 98 percent of creditors had voted in favor of the plan, and 19 outstanding objections were resolved or overruled in a hearing Tuesday that lasted almost four hours. The company’s wind-down plan will become effective April 30.

“In 10 days it will be the anniversary of the filing,” Jeffrey Ellman, a Chrysler attorney, told Gonzalez, saying it was difficult to reach consensus on a wind-down plan for such a large company. He also spoke of the “extraordinary circumstances in which the bankruptcy was filed, for the company, the economy, and the country.”

“Extensive amounts of time have been spent to develop funding for the liquidation plan,” he added.

Ellman had said at a Jan. 21 hearing that a key issue was whether the company would have enough money to liquidate its remaining assets, given the U.S. had allotted only $260 million for wind-down costs.

The plan approved today was updated to include a $15 million “environmental reserve” to cover cleanup costs for hazardous waste at properties that Chrysler may not be able to sell, Ellman told Gonzalez. He said that of 21 properties that remained in bankruptcy, 10 had been sold, and six are in contract to be sold. The $15 million came out of the $260 million that the U.S. had already set aside, he said.

Objections resolved during the hearing included one from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, which was given permission to sue a trust, called the “environmental reserve,” if Chrysler doesn’t comply with environmental orders at a site of its old facility in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Michigan’s Natural Resources Department, which had objected based on the lack of funds to clean up potentially hazardous materials at one old manufacturing facility, at 6700 Lynch Road in Detroit, withdrew its objection. Under an agreement, Chrysler will create a trust funded with $500,000 for the property, according to court documents.

Under an outline already approved by Gonzalez Jan. 21, the remainder of the company will wind down, giving the U.S. no predicted recovery on its $5 billion loan under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The U.S. and Canadian governments may receive a small recovery from liquidated assets such as the sale of Chrysler’s employee cars.

A $4 billion loan prior to the bankruptcy was increased to $5 billion, and the U.S. can make a credit bid on any assets that are to be sold, according to the wind-down plan. Creditors with “other secured claims” are estimated to get all of the $20.6 million they are owed. The recovery for unsecured claims is “undetermined.”

U.S. taxpayers are likely to lose $30.4 billion of their total $81.1 billion investment in Chrysler, General Motors and auto-supply companies, according to a December report from the Government Accountability Office. At the time, taxpayers’ net investment in Chrysler was $14.3 billion, according to the GAO.

Investors who had challenged the bankruptcy sale, including the Indiana State Police Pension Trust, had argued that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner violated the Constitution by using TARP money to finance the sale, and had their arguments overruled in the appeals court.

Recovery for unsecured creditors will come from any proceeds of litigation with Daimler. According to court documents, the suit on behalf of Old Carco names individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, and Daimler for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty.

Chrysler’s creditors sued Daimler in August, seeking unspecified “billions” that Daimler allegedly stripped from the automaker in 2007, just before selling it to Cerberus Capital Management LP. Daimler knew in 2006 that Chrysler was a failure, burdened with debt and declining sales, creditors alleged. They seek a jury trial to determine damages.

Chrysler Group LLC, a new company that bought some assets of Chrysler LLC, was created on June 10 and is 20 percent-owned by Fiat.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.