IBJNews

Chrysler's old assets in bankruptcy can be liquidated, court rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chrysler LLC, the 85-year-old carmaker still partially in bankruptcy as Old Carco LLC, won approval to liquidate under a plan that may repay the U.S. almost nothing for its bailout and lets unsecured creditors keep any proceeds from a pending lawsuit against Daimler AG.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Arthur Gonzalez in Manhattan on Tuesday approved Old Carco’s Chapter 11 liquidation, which resolves all remaining objections in the case that began on April 30, 2009. The day it filed, Chrysler agreed that Fiat SpA would pay $2 billion for a stake in the company while Chrysler kept the remnants, including $27 billion of debt, in bankruptcy. A federal appeals court in Manhattan upheld the sale.

“The relevant confirmation standards have been satisfied, therefore the court confirms the plan,” Gonzalez said.

About 98 percent of creditors had voted in favor of the plan, and 19 outstanding objections were resolved or overruled in a hearing Tuesday that lasted almost four hours. The company’s wind-down plan will become effective April 30.

“In 10 days it will be the anniversary of the filing,” Jeffrey Ellman, a Chrysler attorney, told Gonzalez, saying it was difficult to reach consensus on a wind-down plan for such a large company. He also spoke of the “extraordinary circumstances in which the bankruptcy was filed, for the company, the economy, and the country.”

“Extensive amounts of time have been spent to develop funding for the liquidation plan,” he added.

Ellman had said at a Jan. 21 hearing that a key issue was whether the company would have enough money to liquidate its remaining assets, given the U.S. had allotted only $260 million for wind-down costs.

The plan approved today was updated to include a $15 million “environmental reserve” to cover cleanup costs for hazardous waste at properties that Chrysler may not be able to sell, Ellman told Gonzalez. He said that of 21 properties that remained in bankruptcy, 10 had been sold, and six are in contract to be sold. The $15 million came out of the $260 million that the U.S. had already set aside, he said.

Objections resolved during the hearing included one from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, which was given permission to sue a trust, called the “environmental reserve,” if Chrysler doesn’t comply with environmental orders at a site of its old facility in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Michigan’s Natural Resources Department, which had objected based on the lack of funds to clean up potentially hazardous materials at one old manufacturing facility, at 6700 Lynch Road in Detroit, withdrew its objection. Under an agreement, Chrysler will create a trust funded with $500,000 for the property, according to court documents.

Under an outline already approved by Gonzalez Jan. 21, the remainder of the company will wind down, giving the U.S. no predicted recovery on its $5 billion loan under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The U.S. and Canadian governments may receive a small recovery from liquidated assets such as the sale of Chrysler’s employee cars.

A $4 billion loan prior to the bankruptcy was increased to $5 billion, and the U.S. can make a credit bid on any assets that are to be sold, according to the wind-down plan. Creditors with “other secured claims” are estimated to get all of the $20.6 million they are owed. The recovery for unsecured claims is “undetermined.”

U.S. taxpayers are likely to lose $30.4 billion of their total $81.1 billion investment in Chrysler, General Motors and auto-supply companies, according to a December report from the Government Accountability Office. At the time, taxpayers’ net investment in Chrysler was $14.3 billion, according to the GAO.

Investors who had challenged the bankruptcy sale, including the Indiana State Police Pension Trust, had argued that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner violated the Constitution by using TARP money to finance the sale, and had their arguments overruled in the appeals court.

Recovery for unsecured creditors will come from any proceeds of litigation with Daimler. According to court documents, the suit on behalf of Old Carco names individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, and Daimler for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty.

Chrysler’s creditors sued Daimler in August, seeking unspecified “billions” that Daimler allegedly stripped from the automaker in 2007, just before selling it to Cerberus Capital Management LP. Daimler knew in 2006 that Chrysler was a failure, burdened with debt and declining sales, creditors alleged. They seek a jury trial to determine damages.

Chrysler Group LLC, a new company that bought some assets of Chrysler LLC, was created on June 10 and is 20 percent-owned by Fiat.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT