IBJNews

CIB approves $33.5 million deal to keep Indiana Pacers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Pacers likely will stay put in their current home of Conseco Fieldhouse for at least the next three years, thanks to a deal approved Friday afternoon by the Capital Improvement Board that provides the franchise at least $33.5 million.

Under the terms of the agreement, the CIB will give Pacers Sports & Entertainment $10 million per year for three years, specifically to defray the costs of operating Conseco Fieldhouse. The CIB also has agreed to pay at least $3.5 million for capital improvements at the venue.

The Pacers' lease at Conseco Fieldhouse extends through 2019, but the team has the right to opt out. In negotiations with the city, Pacers officials said they lost money every year but one since moving into the fieldhouse and could no longer afford to pay the $14 to $18 million required annually to operate the facility.

“This deal has the benefit of taking uncertainly off the table for three years,” said CIB member David Shane during board discussion of the agreement.

Shane raised the possibility that franchise owner Herb Simon might sell the team after tiring of shouldering losses. And, echoing sentiments from several other board members, Shane noted that both the city and the Pacers’ financial futures could be clearer in three years’ time.

“I don’t want to tempt fate,” Shane said. The agreement was approved by a 6-1 vote.

The sole voice of dissent belonged CIB member Douglas Brown, who acknowledged the Pacers’ value to downtown Indianapolis but preferred that the city and team craft a longer-term deal now, rather than delay for three years.

“I don’t think the environment for a long-term deal is going to get any better [than it is currently],” Brown said. “I think we need to strike while the iron is hot. … It took us two years to get this agreement. I would hate to think that we’d be perpetually in negotiations with the Pacers.”

As part of the deal, the Pacers must repay at least part of the $33.5 million if the team leaves before 2019.

A CIB-commissioned study concluded that the Pacers along with the Indiana Fever contribute an estimated $55 million a year to the Indianapolis economy.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Penalty For Moving
    Yet another article that fails to mention that the Pacers were looking at a $150 million penalty if the Simons tried to sell the team and break the lease.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So, Pence wants the federal government to ignore the 2008 law that allows children from these countries to argue for asylum in front of a judge. How did this guy become governor? And how is that we'll soon be subjected to repeatedly seeing him on TV being taken seriously as a presidential candidate? Am I in Bizzaro-U.S.A.?

  2. "And the most rigorous studies of one-year preschool programs have shown short-term benefits that fade out in a few years or no benefits at all." So we are going down a path that seems to have proven not to work very well. Right intention, wrong approach?

  3. Well for Dunkin Donuts it might say that even a highly popular outlet can't make a poorly sited location work. That little strip has seen near constant churn for years.

  4. Years ago, the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device companies shifted their research investment away from Medical Institutions to focus more on private research centers, primarily because of medical institution inefficiencies in initiating clinical studies and their inability/commitment to enroll the needed number of patients in these studies. The protracted timelines of the medical institutions were prompting significant delays in the availability of new drug and medical device entities for patients and relatedly, higher R and D expenditures to the commercial industry because of these delays. While the above stated IU Health "ratio is about $2.50 in federal funding for every $1 in industry funding", the available funding is REVERSED as commercial R and D (primarily Phase I-IV clinical work)runs $2.50 to $1 for available federal funding ($76.8B to $30.9B in 2011). The above article significatly understated the available R and D funding from industry......see the Pharma and Medical Device industry websites. Clearly, if medical institutions like IU Health wish to attract more commercial studies, they will need to become more competitive with private clinical sites in their ability to be more efficient and in their commitment to meet study enrollment goals on time. Lastly, to the reference to the above Washington Post article headlined “As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias", lacks some credibility as both FDA and Institutional Institutional Review Boards must approve the high proportion of these studies before studies are started. This means that both study safety and science must be approved by both entities.

  5. ChIeF and all the other critics – better is better no matter what. Get over it; they are doing better despite you ?

ADVERTISEMENT