IBJNews

CIB budget could face rough ride in council

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Capital Improvement Board on Monday will begin the arduous task of convincing a skeptical panel of City-County Council members to adopt a budget for next year that includes $10 million for the Indiana Pacers.

Members of the council’s seven-member Municipal Corporations Committee already are expressing discontent about the $73.1 million operating budget CIB officials will present to them on Monday evening. While the committee won’t vote on its recommendation until Oct. 19, councilors from both political parties said last week they were inclined to reject it.

That could signal a tough ride for the budget in the full council, which is expected to vote on it Oct. 25.
 
“I could see us just saying, ‘No, we’re not going to approve your budget,’” Bob Lutz, a Republican who sits on the Municipal Corporations Committee said of the committee vote.

“There’s a lot of discontent on the council with what they did,” he said in reference to the Pacers’ funding.

This summer, CIB and Republican Mayor Greg Ballard’s administration laid out a plan to provide the Pacers with $33.5 million over three years, including $10 million per year to operate Conseco Fieldhouse where the NBA franchise plays and a total of $3.5 million for improvements to the venue.

CIB provided the Pacers’ first $10 million in July from this year’s $63 million budget, which the council already had approved. But the council must sign off on the $73.1 million for next year, which includes the next $10 million installment.

If the council committee were to reject CIB’s budget later this month, it would go to the full council with a negative recommendation. The 29-member council ultimately will decide whether to approve it, based in part on that recommendation. The committee or the full council also could amend the budget to remove $10 million from CIB’s budget, but it’s not clear whether the council could specifically bar CIB from providing the Pacers with $10 million, said Bob Elrod, the council’s attorney.

Ryan Vaughn, the council’s Republican president, said the CIB budget is always among the toughest to pass, but he expects this year’s will be particularly difficult.

If the full council were to reject next year’s budget, CIB would revert back to its budget for this year, which is $10 million less.

CIB President Ann Lathrop said she “would not want to predict” whether the board could find $10 million in cuts needed to make the Pacers payment and carry out CIB’s other functions operating the city’s convention center and sports venues.

“That’s a significant percentage,” she said.

Councilors such as Lutz disapprove of providing the Pacers with tax dollars. He said he made a tough choice last year in approving a 1-percent hotel tax hike, which, along with state loans and an increased take of sales and income tax revenue, helped CIB avert a projected $47 million deficit.

It angers him that the board is now asking to spend more to help a private operation.

“I’m furious about the CIB,” Lutz said. “They came to us last year and said we don’t have the money to operate and we need this tax increase.”

CIB officials, however, point out that the board also made draconian cuts and maneuvered to resolve a $25.4 million debt insurance issue.

For other councilors, funding CIB seems a misplaced priority when other agencies such as IndyGo and the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library, whose budgets they also approve, are struggling. Those agencies receive funding from different sources than CIB, which this year will get some property tax money from a downtown tax district but gets most of its revenue from taxes on things such as income, food, beverages, auto rentals and hotels.

But Maggie Lewis, a council Democrat on the Municipal Corporations Committee, said the city needs to come up with creative solutions for the other entities before CIB gets her support.

“If we can find dollars to support [the CIB], why can’t we do the same for the other two municipal corporations?” Lewis said. “We find ways to fund things that are important to us.”

Jackie Nytes, another Democrat on the committee, said her frustration stems from the way the process was handled.

Earlier this fall, the city’s Metropolitan Development Commission approved setting aside $8 million in property tax money from a downtown tax-increment financing (TIF) district to CIB. That money must be used to benefit the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association, but it also frees up other CIB money that otherwise would go toward that group.

Nytes said she sees using the TIF money as a way of getting around having the council approve additional CIB dollars to benefit the Pacers.

“If I were voting Monday, I probably would vote against it,” Nytes said. “My whole problem with the whole thing is the surreptitious way they went about it.”

City officials, however, have said the process was transparent because all MDC meetings are public.

Lathrop said she hopes the council discussion will be positive and emphasized the importance of CIB's having adequate funding next year. The expanded convention center is scheduled to open early in 2011.

“In a time when we’re nearly doubling the size of our convention center, we have to service the people who are going to be in that building,” Lathrop said.

The CIB budget will be presented to the Municipal Corporations Committee at 5:30 p.m. Monday in room 260 of the City-County Building, 200 E. Washington St.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ballard can only Lie
    Ballard promoted that deal publicily and falsely told people that property tax money would not be used.
    What did you expect. He did it in the campaign about property taxes to get elected, claiming he would rescend the tax increase, but then after he was elected, did NOT. Ballard is part of that GOP agenda that if at first you don't deceive, lie, lie, lie again and again.
    No money for basic services and schools, but money for the pacers? He thinks he upholds family values, but actually he is only upholding and promoting money in his pockets from the big corporations who would have him sell all of the city assets to them. Water company, parking meters, schools, you name it.
    What a liar, what a GOP elected offical.
  • This should be the story
    CIB officials, however, point out that the board also made draconian cuts and maneuvered to resolve a $25.4 million debt insurance issue.
    Why was the CIB involved in what must have been credit default swaps?
  • Ballard Is Responsible
    Mayor Ballard is directly responsible for giving the Pacers $33.5 million of our tax dollars. Ballard promoted that deal publicily and falsely told people that property tax money would not be used. He also went along with a phony "study" showing the value of the Pacers.
  • Recall Now!
    Fleeced Indy residents -- start a recall of any council member who votes to approve $10M per year to the billionaire owners of the Pacers while closing your libraries, cutting your transit and foolishly thinking of selling your parking meters. Where is the outcry about no-one having seen the Pacers books? Why are you not outraged as grand theft on a grand scale of PUBLIC funds is being committed right before your eyes by your elected local officials? Oh, I forgot, it's only the Democrats who are turning us into a Socialist country. Your hypocrisy and utter stupidity is leading Indy to be the butt of jokes across the country. Start the recalls now!
  • Let them eat cake
    Hope this is more than just some theatre for the public.

    Some folks need to be accountable for not listening to the public and defying common sense.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT