IBJNews

UPDATE: CIB backs grant for Big Ten football championship

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The city’s Capital Improvement Board on Monday afternoon voted to approve a $125,000 grant that will help the Indiana Sports Corp. put on two high-profile events—the inaugural Big Ten Football Championship game in December and the Big Ten basketball tournament in March.

The money will help stage and promote the events. The first Big Ten Football Championship game will be Dec. 3 in Lucas Oil Stadium.

Indiana Sports Corp. officials, who are in charge of game operations, declined to divulge the game’s budget. In its contract with the city, the Big Ten agreed to pay CIB a $363,000 license fee to host the game.

CIB President Ann Lathrop said before the board's meeting that the real payoff will be the event's sizable impact on the local economy. Big Ten officials are predicting a sellout crowd of more than 63,000 will attend the game, and the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association estimates the annual economic impact will be $17.7 million.

Some sports business experts expect that number to be closer to $20 million. The economic impact for the Southeastern Conference's championship football game is $30 million, officials said, and the Big 12 title game generated about $20 million last year.

If the experts prove correct, the Big Ten Football Championship will not only be one of the five biggest non-bowl college football games in the country. It also will be one of the top sporting events in Indianapolis based on economic impact.

“We anticipate a lot of interest in this game and tens of thousands of visitors to the city,” Lathrop said. “Those people will be staying in our hotels, eating in our restaurants and shopping in our shops. And hopefully a lot of these people who come here for the game will be impressed by what our city has to offer and come back for another visit.”

The Big Ten Football Championship will be played at Lucas Oil Stadium through 2015.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Not equal
    The previous comment comparing the B10 Basketball championship to the Football championship is not a fair comparison. In basketball the conference championship is a minor event compared to the March Madness Tournament that follows it. Perhaps looking at the numbers from the Final Four compared to the B10 football game may be more accurate although experts agreed that having the home team (Butler) in the mix really hurt the economic impact the event had on the city.
  • One Thing's For Sure
    However much money gets spent at this year's Championship game, it will come from out of state.
  • We Expect Better CIB Stewardship
    Here is the justification for giving the Indiana Sports Corp a $125,000 grant from the CIB's $363,000 Big Ten license fee.

    "Big Ten officials are predicting a sellout crowd of more than 63,000 will attend the game, and the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association estimates the annual economic impact will be $17.7 million. Some sports business experts(Indiana Sports Corp) expect that number to be closer to $20 million."

    The problem is the Indianapolis Convention & Vistors Association estimated that the 86,767 visitors to the 2011 men's Big Ten basketball tournament in Indianapolis that spanned four days had a economic impact of only $8 million, making a $17.7 - $20 million economic impact for Big Ten football completely ridiculous and unrealistic. This on top of "Indiana Sports Corp. officials, who are in charge of game operations, declining to divulge the game’s budget."

    My banker has a fiduciary responsibility not to accept fantasy profit projections with no supporting budget as justification for giving away any money, why should the financially struggling CIB?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

    I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

    Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

  2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

  3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

  4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

  5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

ADVERTISEMENT