IBJNews

UPDATE: CIB backs grant for Big Ten football championship

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city’s Capital Improvement Board on Monday afternoon voted to approve a $125,000 grant that will help the Indiana Sports Corp. put on two high-profile events—the inaugural Big Ten Football Championship game in December and the Big Ten basketball tournament in March.

The money will help stage and promote the events. The first Big Ten Football Championship game will be Dec. 3 in Lucas Oil Stadium.

Indiana Sports Corp. officials, who are in charge of game operations, declined to divulge the game’s budget. In its contract with the city, the Big Ten agreed to pay CIB a $363,000 license fee to host the game.

CIB President Ann Lathrop said before the board's meeting that the real payoff will be the event's sizable impact on the local economy. Big Ten officials are predicting a sellout crowd of more than 63,000 will attend the game, and the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association estimates the annual economic impact will be $17.7 million.

Some sports business experts expect that number to be closer to $20 million. The economic impact for the Southeastern Conference's championship football game is $30 million, officials said, and the Big 12 title game generated about $20 million last year.

If the experts prove correct, the Big Ten Football Championship will not only be one of the five biggest non-bowl college football games in the country. It also will be one of the top sporting events in Indianapolis based on economic impact.

“We anticipate a lot of interest in this game and tens of thousands of visitors to the city,” Lathrop said. “Those people will be staying in our hotels, eating in our restaurants and shopping in our shops. And hopefully a lot of these people who come here for the game will be impressed by what our city has to offer and come back for another visit.”

The Big Ten Football Championship will be played at Lucas Oil Stadium through 2015.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not equal
    The previous comment comparing the B10 Basketball championship to the Football championship is not a fair comparison. In basketball the conference championship is a minor event compared to the March Madness Tournament that follows it. Perhaps looking at the numbers from the Final Four compared to the B10 football game may be more accurate although experts agreed that having the home team (Butler) in the mix really hurt the economic impact the event had on the city.
  • One Thing's For Sure
    However much money gets spent at this year's Championship game, it will come from out of state.
  • We Expect Better CIB Stewardship
    Here is the justification for giving the Indiana Sports Corp a $125,000 grant from the CIB's $363,000 Big Ten license fee.

    "Big Ten officials are predicting a sellout crowd of more than 63,000 will attend the game, and the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association estimates the annual economic impact will be $17.7 million. Some sports business experts(Indiana Sports Corp) expect that number to be closer to $20 million."

    The problem is the Indianapolis Convention & Vistors Association estimated that the 86,767 visitors to the 2011 men's Big Ten basketball tournament in Indianapolis that spanned four days had a economic impact of only $8 million, making a $17.7 - $20 million economic impact for Big Ten football completely ridiculous and unrealistic. This on top of "Indiana Sports Corp. officials, who are in charge of game operations, declining to divulge the game’s budget."

    My banker has a fiduciary responsibility not to accept fantasy profit projections with no supporting budget as justification for giving away any money, why should the financially struggling CIB?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

ADVERTISEMENT