IBJNews

CIB saves $1M after state agrees to lower loan rate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The city’s cash-strapped Capital Improvement Board received a drop of good news recently when it learned that a reduced interest rate on a state loan will save the agency about $1 million.

CIB officials are expected to publicly announce that news at a meeting Friday afternoon at the Indiana Convention Center, where they'll also vote on a $33 million bailout plan for the Indiana Pacers.

The CIB is expected to approve allotting $30 million over the next three years toward the operation of Conseco Fieldhouse, the home of the Pacers, in addition to at least $3.5 million for capital improvements to the 11-year-old building.

Though the CIB already announced its plans to give the Pacers the money at a press conference Monday, CIB members still must approve the funding.

“I expect this to be a widely attended meeting,” CIB President Ann Lathrop said. “I’m sure we’ll have some comments from the audience and a lively discussion of this among [CIB] members.”

The CIB is the public agency that manages several downtown facilities, including Lucas Oil Stadium, the Indiana Convention Center, Conseco Fieldhouse and Victory Field, among others.

Due to the CIB’s fiscal difficulties, the state last year agreed to loan the CIB $27 million through the State Treasurer’s office. The interest rate provided in December on the first $9 million of that loan was 5.25 percent. The rate was set due to the tenuous financial condition of the CIB and the fact that the 2008 financial statements were issued in May 2009 with a “going concern” opinion, explained Robert Vane, spokesman for Mayor Greg Ballard.

Although the 2008 financial statements were re-issued in November 2009 removing the “going concern,” the treasurer still found the CIB to be a potential financial risk.

After the CIB’s 2009 financial statements issued by the State Board of Accounts found the CIB to once again have a clean audit and no “going concern,” CIB officials reached out to the state treasurer’s office and asked them to consider a rate reduction on its state loan, explained Vane. A 1-percentage-point reduction was granted this month, bringing the interest rate to 4.25 percent, saving the CIB approximately $1 million over the life of the $9 million loan.

The CIB has until December of this year to determine if it needs the second $9 million installment of the loan, and until December 2011 to decide if it needs the third installment. The interest rates will be determined on those installments at the time the loan is granted.

“Anytime you can save the taxpayers $1 million, it’s a good day,” said  Lathrop. “We’re very pleased with this determination.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ballards corporate bailout is most disgusting in history
    Can you really believe this? Closing libraries and schools while handing over tax dollars to the wealthiest family in the state- in the name of entertainment?

    I am a republican, the old non big spending type- not the types from the past decade, but the mayors corporate bailout hypocrisy has completely clouded any reasonable judgment he was supposed to have.

    This corporate bailout is the worst republican bailouts yet!

    I found a great symbolic Pacers Bailout sticker for my car: http://www.StickEmUpIndy.com
  • Questions
    Jeff, Last year's bailout legislation for the CIB included a provision that allowed the State Treasurer to loan up to $27 million to the CIB over three years in $9 million increments. The legislation does not specify the loan terms, such as interest or the repayment schedule. That leaves it to the State Treasurer's discretion to work that out. Presumably, the State Treasurer is affording the CIB a lower interest rate because of falling interest rates as of late.
  • Questions
    I'll be the first to admit that I don't understand the process by which the state loans money to the CIB. Given that, I have a few questions:

    Where does the state get the money to loan the CIB?
    How is the state able to arbitrarily reduce the interest rate?
    If the CIB "saves" $1 million, does the state "lose" $1 million?

    Can someone explain this process?

    Thanks.
    • What savings?
      Your reporting here is disingenuous, Anthony. Instead of talking about the money saved from the lower interest rate, why aren't you mentioning how much in additional interest it costs to borrow the money, which Lathrop incidentally said they didn't need at the time they took out the loan, or how the CIB plans to repay the borrowed funds or these additional operating costs the CIB is picking up for billionaire Herb Simon? I have studied the latest financials for the CIB. They are not a pretty picture at all. The debt keeps mounting and the future revenues look bleak in the near term. Short of another tax increase or another bailout for the CIB, the CIB will be facing insolvency once again in a very short period of time.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT