IBJNews

Citimark rejoins development game

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Citimark Realty Partners is dipping its toes back into the development waters more than a decade after abandoning new projects to focus on management and leasing.

The company, founded in 1982, last month broke ground on an 8,000-square-foot medical building near the northwest corner of 86th Street and Allisonville Road. The project is the first of three buildings the company plans to develop in what it is calling Gardens at Castle Creek.

Citimark started marketing the three-parcel, 2.4-acre site back in 2007 but scaled back marketing when commercial real estate fell on hard times shortly thereafter, said Gus Sevastianos, Citimark’s director of leasing and marketing.

The firm renewed its marketing effort about six months ago. “There’s a niche for this type of product, for small medical users,” said Sevastianos.

The parcel where development is under way was sold to Katherine Enyon Orr, a dentist who is moving her practice to the building. Sevastianos said Orr will occupy all or most of the building. It hasn’t been determined whether Citimark will manage it for her. PNC Bank is financing the project for Orr, who was represented by Halakar Real Estate, now Newmark Knight Frank Halakar.

Citimark is asking one price, between $195 and $205 per square foot, to anyone interested in buying one of the three parcels in Gardens at Castle Creek and having Citimark develop it. The price includes $25 per square foot for interior build-out. The building under construction, which is expected to be completed in May, is farther from 86th and Allisonville than the other two sites and was therefore on the low end of the price range, Sevastianos said.

The two remaining building sites are designed for another 8,000-square-foot building and a 6,440-square-foot building. Sevastianos said the developer expects to sell a second building this year and the third in 2012. Because the larger of the two sites fronts 86th Street it could accommodate retail use, but it won’t become a strip shopping center. Citimark wants all three buildings to conform to the Prairie-style exterior design, which features brick and large expanses of glass.

The Gardens at Castle Creek represent a return to development for Citimark, which operated as a developer for years but began in the 1990s focusing more of its attention on buying and managing buildings and leasing space. Sevastianos said the company owned around 4 million square feet of space at one time but is now down to about 1.9 million square feet split between Indianapolis and Cincinnati.

The company has been shrinking its portfolio over the last decade but is now looking for development opportunities, he said. “We want to get back to our old form.”

Among the properties Citimark sold was most of Castle Creek Corporate Park, which it bought in partnership with New Boston Fund Inc. from Sunbeam Development in 1999. Five years ago it sold four Castle Creek office buildings on the east side of Allisonville Road to California-based Blue Real Estate. Those buildings are in foreclosure.

Citimark kept two older Castle Creek office buildings on the west side of Allisonville. That two-building package included the land Citimark is now marketing as Gardens at Castle Creek. Last March Citimark bought out its partner in those properties, New Boston.
 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

    I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

    Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

  2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

  3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

  4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

  5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

ADVERTISEMENT