IBJNews

Citimark rejoins development game

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Citimark Realty Partners is dipping its toes back into the development waters more than a decade after abandoning new projects to focus on management and leasing.

The company, founded in 1982, last month broke ground on an 8,000-square-foot medical building near the northwest corner of 86th Street and Allisonville Road. The project is the first of three buildings the company plans to develop in what it is calling Gardens at Castle Creek.

Citimark started marketing the three-parcel, 2.4-acre site back in 2007 but scaled back marketing when commercial real estate fell on hard times shortly thereafter, said Gus Sevastianos, Citimark’s director of leasing and marketing.

The firm renewed its marketing effort about six months ago. “There’s a niche for this type of product, for small medical users,” said Sevastianos.

The parcel where development is under way was sold to Katherine Enyon Orr, a dentist who is moving her practice to the building. Sevastianos said Orr will occupy all or most of the building. It hasn’t been determined whether Citimark will manage it for her. PNC Bank is financing the project for Orr, who was represented by Halakar Real Estate, now Newmark Knight Frank Halakar.

Citimark is asking one price, between $195 and $205 per square foot, to anyone interested in buying one of the three parcels in Gardens at Castle Creek and having Citimark develop it. The price includes $25 per square foot for interior build-out. The building under construction, which is expected to be completed in May, is farther from 86th and Allisonville than the other two sites and was therefore on the low end of the price range, Sevastianos said.

The two remaining building sites are designed for another 8,000-square-foot building and a 6,440-square-foot building. Sevastianos said the developer expects to sell a second building this year and the third in 2012. Because the larger of the two sites fronts 86th Street it could accommodate retail use, but it won’t become a strip shopping center. Citimark wants all three buildings to conform to the Prairie-style exterior design, which features brick and large expanses of glass.

The Gardens at Castle Creek represent a return to development for Citimark, which operated as a developer for years but began in the 1990s focusing more of its attention on buying and managing buildings and leasing space. Sevastianos said the company owned around 4 million square feet of space at one time but is now down to about 1.9 million square feet split between Indianapolis and Cincinnati.

The company has been shrinking its portfolio over the last decade but is now looking for development opportunities, he said. “We want to get back to our old form.”

Among the properties Citimark sold was most of Castle Creek Corporate Park, which it bought in partnership with New Boston Fund Inc. from Sunbeam Development in 1999. Five years ago it sold four Castle Creek office buildings on the east side of Allisonville Road to California-based Blue Real Estate. Those buildings are in foreclosure.

Citimark kept two older Castle Creek office buildings on the west side of Allisonville. That two-building package included the land Citimark is now marketing as Gardens at Castle Creek. Last March Citimark bought out its partner in those properties, New Boston.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT