IBJNews

City-County Council, mayor settle on TIF policy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Developers receiving tax-increment finance money from the city of Indianapolis will be asked to set local hiring goals under a new TIF policy agreed upon by City-County Council leaders and Mayor Greg Ballard's administration.

The TIF policy is spelled out in an agreement adopted Monday night by the council's Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee. The Metropolitan Development Commission accepted it earlier this month.

“What this does is it puts discipline around how you analyze a TIF and clear expectations for those who want to propose a TIF,” Council Vice President John Barth said.

The policy could quell the controversy that tends to surround TIF districts, which capture property-tax revenue from new developments for the benefit of a district rather than the entire city. Some councilors have questioned the continued creation of TIF districts, given the impact on other taxing entities, including schools, and the city's ongoing struggle to pay for basic services.

Barth and Vop Osili, the other Democratic councilor who worked on the agreement with Ballard's team, each have backed the creation or expansion of TIF districts. Osili was a key vote on the controversial expansion of the downtown TIF district to include Massachusetts Avenue.

Part of that deal, which paved the way for redevelopment of the city's fire station property, requires developers and builders to hire people who live in the district or adjoining neighborhoods.

Ballard's team readily agreed to make local hiring part of the policy, which includes clawback provisions, Osili said. “When we're spending Marion County taxpayers' dollars, it's important we consider who the beneficiaries are,” he said.

Deputy Mayor for Economic Development Deron Kintner couldn't be reached for comment.

Kintner resisted being locked into new rules regarding TIF districts when former council Vice President Brian Mahern spearheaded a TIF study commission in 2012. At the time, Mahern tried to use support for the Mass Ave project as a bargaining chip that would force Ballard's administration to accept new policies. 

The agreement that Kintner, Metropolitan Development Director Adam Thies and Controller Jason Dudich hammered out with the councilors mirrors the commission's findings but leaves some wiggle room for the administration, saying, for example, that TIF districts should not capture revenue from buildings already under construction “absent substantial justification.”

The next new TIF district will likely be along Madison Avenue on the south side. Under the policy, the administration is to give at least 30 days notice to the chairman of the Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee, the Metropolitan Development Commission and affected taxing entities, which includes school districts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

ADVERTISEMENT