Indianapolis hopeful it can retain Big Ten tournaments

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis officials should know by early summer whether the city will continue hosting Big Ten men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, according to a top executive of the suburban-Chicago-based conference.

The current contract between Indianapolis and the Big Ten expires in 2012, and officials of the conference’s 11 universities are beginning the selection process now. University presidents and chancellors serve as Big Ten directors and recommend their selections to the conference.

Big Ten Deputy Commissioner Brad Traviolia declined to divulge how many cities might be pursuing the tournaments. But he acknowledged Indianapolis will be difficult to unseat.

“We’ve had nothing but a good experience with the city,” he said. “[It’s] done a tremendous job.”

The men’s tournament, which this year tips off Thursday, typically attracts more than 18,000 overnight visitors to Indianapolis over the four-day event and generates $8 million in direct visitor spending. Those numbers jump to 25,000 overnight visitors and $10 million in spending when including the women’s tournament, which this year concluded on Sunday, according to the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association.

Losing the events would be a major blow for Indianapolis’ hospitality industry, but ICVA spokesman Chris Gahl said he is hopeful the city can retain the tournaments.

“These pieces of business are extremely valuable to us in driving tourism,” he said. “We’re a state that fully embraces basketball, and we feel there’s no better place than Conseco Fieldhouse to host tournaments like this.”

Ticket sales likely will play a key role in whether the city maintains its grip on the games.

Combined attendance for this year’s women’s games was 30,957, down nearly 9 percent from last year’s total, according to the Indiana Sports Corp. Attendance for the title game pitting Ohio State University against Penn State University also dipped nearly 9 percent—to 6,227.

Local favorites Indiana University and Purdue University lost in the early rounds of the tournament, which may have dampened attendance.

The Sports Corp. hopes the men’s tournament, however, can build on momentum achieved last year. Ticket sales were 81,625, a nearly 20-percent increase from 2009 and the highest total since Indianapolis began hosting the event on an annual basis in 2008.

A stronger effort to sell tickets involved additional promotions to season-ticket holders at each university, and a new program that offered discounted tickets to students that could be purchased at each campus. Previously, students had to buy tickets at the normal rate through outlets available to the general public.

The men’s tournament had alternated sites between Indianapolis and Chicago beginning in 2002 before Indianapolis won the bid in 2008 to host it outright on an annual basis. Women’s games have been played in the city every year since the tournament started in 1995.

Traviolia at the Big Ten said the conference awarded Indianapolis the men’s tournament in an attempt to grow it at one location. Though the Big Ten remains pleased with the decision, “all options are open at this point,” he said.

The Sports Corp. has not been formally contacted yet by the Big Ten regarding the bid process, spokesman John Dedman said. But he doubted Indianapolis will do anything different than it has in the past to keep the tournaments in the city.

“The best way we can campaign to host these events in the future is to be a good partner and to show them what we’re capable of doing the next few weeks,” he said before the women’s tournament started.

What will be different with the overall bid process, though, is that interested cities also will be vying to host the Big Ten football championship. The inaugural game will be played at Lucas Oil Stadium Dec. 3.

The Big Ten will expand to 12 schools in the fall when the University of Nebraska becomes a member.


  • Indianapolis vs Chicago
    Chicago offers many more people, but Indy has walkability that could not be reached by their sporting venues. Another problem with Chicago is that it is not home to the NCAA. What could be better than giving your conference more facetime with NCAA Leaders than any other conference?
  • no brainer?
    Chicago has more alumni from all schools (not just IU and PU), which means more tickets = more money. Chicago is geographically more central than Indy. Indy is better from a logistics standpoint but that may not carry the day.
  • Detroit
    I imagine Detroit will be bidding. Ford Field can accomodate basketball or they could use Joe Louis Arena. Yeah it is Detroit, but Michigan has two Big Ten schools and it is a neutral site.
  • Columbus
    Yeah I believe that they are tearing down what is left of their downtown mall....
    This should be a no brainer for the Big Ten. Indianapolis is geographically central. We can seat Professional Sports level attendance. We have the seating capacity. We do all sorts of national events (Indy 500, Brickyard, SuperBowl). Chicago? Get serious. Minnesota? Dont make me laugh. Columbus, OH? Okay. They have a football stadium---and maybe a mall. Iowa? Ha. Wisc? Yeah right. Michigan?? Oh come on. This should be a no brainer for the Big Ten. If they were smart they would lock in a looooooong term agreement and get a good price.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............