Indianapolis hopeful it can retain Big Ten tournaments

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis officials should know by early summer whether the city will continue hosting Big Ten men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, according to a top executive of the suburban-Chicago-based conference.

The current contract between Indianapolis and the Big Ten expires in 2012, and officials of the conference’s 11 universities are beginning the selection process now. University presidents and chancellors serve as Big Ten directors and recommend their selections to the conference.

Big Ten Deputy Commissioner Brad Traviolia declined to divulge how many cities might be pursuing the tournaments. But he acknowledged Indianapolis will be difficult to unseat.

“We’ve had nothing but a good experience with the city,” he said. “[It’s] done a tremendous job.”

The men’s tournament, which this year tips off Thursday, typically attracts more than 18,000 overnight visitors to Indianapolis over the four-day event and generates $8 million in direct visitor spending. Those numbers jump to 25,000 overnight visitors and $10 million in spending when including the women’s tournament, which this year concluded on Sunday, according to the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association.

Losing the events would be a major blow for Indianapolis’ hospitality industry, but ICVA spokesman Chris Gahl said he is hopeful the city can retain the tournaments.

“These pieces of business are extremely valuable to us in driving tourism,” he said. “We’re a state that fully embraces basketball, and we feel there’s no better place than Conseco Fieldhouse to host tournaments like this.”

Ticket sales likely will play a key role in whether the city maintains its grip on the games.

Combined attendance for this year’s women’s games was 30,957, down nearly 9 percent from last year’s total, according to the Indiana Sports Corp. Attendance for the title game pitting Ohio State University against Penn State University also dipped nearly 9 percent—to 6,227.

Local favorites Indiana University and Purdue University lost in the early rounds of the tournament, which may have dampened attendance.

The Sports Corp. hopes the men’s tournament, however, can build on momentum achieved last year. Ticket sales were 81,625, a nearly 20-percent increase from 2009 and the highest total since Indianapolis began hosting the event on an annual basis in 2008.

A stronger effort to sell tickets involved additional promotions to season-ticket holders at each university, and a new program that offered discounted tickets to students that could be purchased at each campus. Previously, students had to buy tickets at the normal rate through outlets available to the general public.

The men’s tournament had alternated sites between Indianapolis and Chicago beginning in 2002 before Indianapolis won the bid in 2008 to host it outright on an annual basis. Women’s games have been played in the city every year since the tournament started in 1995.

Traviolia at the Big Ten said the conference awarded Indianapolis the men’s tournament in an attempt to grow it at one location. Though the Big Ten remains pleased with the decision, “all options are open at this point,” he said.

The Sports Corp. has not been formally contacted yet by the Big Ten regarding the bid process, spokesman John Dedman said. But he doubted Indianapolis will do anything different than it has in the past to keep the tournaments in the city.

“The best way we can campaign to host these events in the future is to be a good partner and to show them what we’re capable of doing the next few weeks,” he said before the women’s tournament started.

What will be different with the overall bid process, though, is that interested cities also will be vying to host the Big Ten football championship. The inaugural game will be played at Lucas Oil Stadium Dec. 3.

The Big Ten will expand to 12 schools in the fall when the University of Nebraska becomes a member.


  • Indianapolis vs Chicago
    Chicago offers many more people, but Indy has walkability that could not be reached by their sporting venues. Another problem with Chicago is that it is not home to the NCAA. What could be better than giving your conference more facetime with NCAA Leaders than any other conference?
  • no brainer?
    Chicago has more alumni from all schools (not just IU and PU), which means more tickets = more money. Chicago is geographically more central than Indy. Indy is better from a logistics standpoint but that may not carry the day.
  • Detroit
    I imagine Detroit will be bidding. Ford Field can accomodate basketball or they could use Joe Louis Arena. Yeah it is Detroit, but Michigan has two Big Ten schools and it is a neutral site.
  • Columbus
    Yeah I believe that they are tearing down what is left of their downtown mall....
    This should be a no brainer for the Big Ten. Indianapolis is geographically central. We can seat Professional Sports level attendance. We have the seating capacity. We do all sorts of national events (Indy 500, Brickyard, SuperBowl). Chicago? Get serious. Minnesota? Dont make me laugh. Columbus, OH? Okay. They have a football stadium---and maybe a mall. Iowa? Ha. Wisc? Yeah right. Michigan?? Oh come on. This should be a no brainer for the Big Ten. If they were smart they would lock in a looooooong term agreement and get a good price.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?